[ad_1]
On August 31, the CSDT agency of the Ministry of Public Security transferred the conclusion of the investigation of the case “violating accounting regulations, causing serious consequences; violating the regulations on the management and use of state property, causing losses.” , waste “occurred at Yen Khanh Group Joint Stock Company (Yen Khanh Company), Cuu Long Corporation and related units in the bidding and toll collection of the Ho Chi Minh City – Trung Luong Highway, to VKSND Supreme.
Know the law but deliberately break it
Consequently, the Ministry of Public Security CSDT proposed to prosecute the accused: Dinh La Thang (former Minister of Transport – Transport); Nguyen Hong Truong (former Deputy Minister of Transport), Nguyen Tri Thanh (former Director of the Finance Department of the Ministry of Transport), Duong Tuan Minh (former Director General of the Corporation for Investment and Development of Traffic Infrastructure Project Management Cuu Long – Cuu Long Corporation), Duong Thi Tram Anh (former Deputy General Manager of Cuu Long Corporation), Nguyen Thu Trang (former Deputy Director of the Investment Department of Cuu Long Corporation), Le Trung Cuong (specialist in the Department of the Ministry of Transportation of Finance ) together on the crime of “Violation of the rules on the use of state property causes loss and waste.”
In addition, Dinh Ngoc System (“bald”, former Deputy CEO of Thai Son Corporation, Ministry of Defense), Pham Van Diet (former CEO of Duc Binh Company) and 10 other defendants were prosecuted for the same crime of “fraudulent appropriation of property”.
The investigation concludes that Mr. Dinh La Thang, as minister, is assigned to manage the property, including the right to collect the Ho Chi Minh City – Trung Luong highway charges. Mr. Dinh La Thang is well versed in the laws on state property management and transfer of right to charge fees, recognizing that this is a unique asset of great value and he needs to seek a capable partner. optimize the sale of toll rights. However, in February 2012, after being approved in writing by the Prime Minister on the policy of selling the right to charge fees, Mr. Dinh La Thang called Duong Tuan Minh and gave instructions for Ut’s company will go “bald”. purchase rights to collect fees.
During the implementation process, Mr. Dinh La Thang knew that all project implementation activities and auction results were conducted in contravention of the law, thus the Yen Khanh company of the defendant Dinh Ngoc System won the auction . according to Mr. Thang’s initial introduction. In addition, Mr. Dinh La Thang also knew that the Yen Khanh Company expanded, did not pay the auction on time, had to terminate the contract early and transfer the right to collect the fees to the state. However, Mr. Dinh La Thang not only did not order the premature termination of the contract, but also requested Duong Tuan Minh to let the company pay slowly.
From left to right: Mr. Dinh La Thang, Nguyen Hong Truong and Dinh Ngoc System (“bald”). Photo: DOCUMENTATION
Maximum favor for Ut “bald”
In addition, Mr. Dinh La Thang also approved a pen to allow Yen Khanh Company to be an investor to build two additional intersections on the route connecting Tan Tao – Cho Dem and proposed to allow the company to deduct the correct amount. payment under the contract, the right to charge fees, creating favorable conditions for the company to benefit.
Out of the wrongdoing of Mr. Dinh La Thang and his accomplices, Dinh Ngoc System’s company helped usurp the amount of 725 billion VND. “Mr. Thang’s behavior constitutes a crime.” Violation of regulations on the management and use of state property causes loss and waste. “Mr. Thang has a leading and intellectual role,” the investigation concluded.
The conclusion of the investigation determines that Mr. Nguyen Hong Truong signed a decision approving the initial price of the auction for the right to charge fees, but not through the price determination council or the hiring of a price appraisal organization . Mr. Truong also signed a decision to allow the sales council to designate when only one participant bids and bids equal to the starting price. In addition, Mr. Truong also signed a notice that Yen Khanh Company and Khanh An Company are eligible to participate in the auction for the right to collect high-speed tolls in Ho Chi Minh City – Trung Luong without the approval of the members. of the Auction Council. .
When Yen Khanh Company does not make payment on time, Mr. Nguyen Hong Truong not only orders to terminate the contract but also signs 9 documents, chairs the meeting to direct Cuu Long Corporation to continue urging Yen Company. Khanh pays. Mr. Nguyen Hong Truong’s behavior violates many laws and causes damage to state property.
Counterfeiting and deception
Defendant Dinh Ngoc System for the purpose of appropriating the right to collect fees, so from the beginning, there was a fraudulent trick, directing employees to falsify the loss to profit report and falsify the confirmation of the audit unit in the financial report. since 2001, 2002. Since then, Ut’s “bald” company has qualified to participate in the auction even though the business situation is at a loss. After winning the auction, due to the lack of financial capacity to pay the contract, Ut “bald” has extended the payment term for the purchase right.
During the fee collection process, the defendant Dinh Ngoc System continued to cheat, ordering the purchase and use of Xuan Phi Company software to conceal the income, and the report was not true. From these deceptive acts, the defendant Dinh Ngoc System, with the help of his accomplices, seized the state for 725 billion VND.
[ad_2]
