Deputy Prime Minister Vu Duc Dam: Some directors still want their rights to the biggest | Education

11/27/2020 Science, Technology, Vietnam, World



[ad_1]

Today, November 27, in Hanoi, the Committee on Culture, Education, Youth, Adolescence and Childhood of the National Assembly (CISC and ND) cooperates with various universities to hold a seminar “Autonomy in education”. Education: from politics to practice ”. The seminar ran throughout the day, including 3 sessions: general topics, autonomy in higher education, financial autonomy in higher education.
After the second session, Mr. Vu Duc Dam, Deputy Prime Minister of the Government, shared some guiding views of the Government on the promotion of university autonomy. Consequently, we have only been one step to innovate university autonomy, a long way ahead. This journey is one-way, which means there is no return, because autonomy is the implicit nature of higher education.

State governed by law

Mr. Dam outlined 5 stakeholder issues to resolve when implementing university autonomy. In the first place, university autonomy is professional autonomy (called academic autonomy in the West), to have an advanced governance model it must exist. Second, autonomy is linked to accountability, not accountability to state agencies, but accountability to all of society, including: students, teachers, school staff, with parents with society.
Third, autonomy does not mean that the state no longer invests. With this in mind, Mr. Dam explained: “It means that this is not a compensation condition, as if the state no longer invests, then there is autonomy. Not that way. In fact, the Vietnam Academy of Agriculture, the Hanoi University of Science and Technology, the National University of Economics … although being autonomous, the state still wastes more money by borrowing tens of millions of dollars from the Bank. The world to invest. It is true that the Government is directing the related organizations to drastically create a mechanism for assigning tasks, ordering training with the State budget ”.

Fourth, the Government clearly defines (in line with the world trend) that autonomy does not mean relaxing management. The State governs the university by law, in all aspects. For example, although it is a university, if you are building a house, you must comply with the regulations of the construction industry, you must comply with the police regulations on prevention and fire fighting …

With the fifth issue, Mr. Dam emphasized: “This is a very important point: autonomy, but without reducing the access opportunities of the poor and the beneficiaries of the policies. There is data showing that this indicator has not decreased, but we need to do more, as the ordering mechanism remains slow. For example, the state incentivizes and grants money for ethnic minority children to go to university, before returning this money to school, it can now be awarded through scholarships. Or the state wants to develop a certain profession, then commission it for training schools ”.

One of the two most problematic issues concerns civil servants and salaries.

According to Mr. Dam, the problems related to state management related to the education and training sector in university autonomy are not many and there are no major problems. Some seem to still be in trouble because the schools have not read the text carefully, or they still think the same way. There are still 2 real problems with state management. One is related to the personnel and salary regulations of the Ministry of the Interior; the second is about budget, investment, ordering, related to the financial and investment sector, this is the basic problem.

In addition to the 5 previous problems (which are the common problems of the world when it comes to implementing university autonomy), we must implement the ordering and transfer of power. This is a very notable issue for Vietnam and other countries with similar conditions.

In this disposition and change of power there is a very strong change in the role of the owner. Previously, the superior agency was the owner and the governing body, directly intervening too much in the operation of the university. Now that power must be transferred gradually, from the governing body (that is, the owning agency) to the school board, which represents the owner.

In addition, we must make a partial transition from the state management agencies (ie the Ministry of Education and Training) to the school board; a partial transfer of authority from the principal and administrators to the school board.

To do this, schools must have a school council in accordance with the law. This shift in power has yet to take place in many places due to a lack of communication within schools, mainly due to the perception of the leadership team. “Some principals themselves don’t want to lose their rights, they don’t want to transfer their rights to the school board, they still want me to be the principal, I’m the greatest in the school. Now we must have a clear orientation for the schools, the principals are not simultaneously secretaries of the party committee, ”said Deputy Prime Minister Vu Duc Dam.




[ad_2]

Designed by Tricksfast Solutions
© Copyright 2024, All Rights Reserved