[ad_1]
Ms. Dao Thi Huong Lan. Photo: TL
The investigation concludes that the Permanent Vice President of the People’s Committee of the City is not in charge of the management and reordering of state assets, he is not a member of the Steering Committee of the City 09, but Mr. Tai signed the document to send it to the units related. content of the approval for the exchange of assets 185 Hai Ba Trung and property 57 Cao Thang.
Mr. Tai’s approval for the exchange of 2 assets leads to no unit responsible for verifying and verifying the legal conditions of real estate No. 57 Cao Thang, does not discover that the house number 57 Cao Thang has been a mortgage, being deceived by Ms. Diep resulting in damage to state property in the amount of 325 billion VND.
CQĐT determined that Mr. Tai was responsible for the case. However, in the course of the investigation, Mr. Tai sincerely declared, regretted, and was a previous position, had many contributions, so it was necessary to consider mitigating it.
Mrs. Diep and Mr. Tai. Photo: CACC
Defendant Lan did not rely on the Prime Minister’s Decision No. 09/2007 on the Reorganization and Management of State Housing and the Law on the Management and Use of State Property.
Ms. Lan only relied on the approval of the policy for the implementation of the exchange of the leaders of the People’s Committee of the City and in fact the matter had already been proposed to request related parties to provide legal procedures for sufficient procedures to meet the requirements. formalize files according to the order and competence to be resolved.
While Ms. Lan knew that the property exchange between Ms. Diep’s company and the light music center was not in accordance with regulations, the authority violated state regulations on property management.
At the same time, you are also aware that the right to use legal, uncontested and mortgage land at 57 Cao Thang of Diep Bach Duong Company is a mandatory and prerequisite for the conversion to take place. change. However, he did not set out to direct and carry out the inspection and verification of the legal conditions of the property at 57 Cao Thang, unfairly believing in the Diep Bach Duong company and music center. light. Since then, Ms. Lan has not discovered that property number 57 Cao Thang was mortgaged.
According to CQĐT, the investigation documents did not determine whether Ms. Lan had an interest or other personal motive in the liquidation of the asset exchange.
With the above behavior, Ms. Lan committed an irresponsible crime that led to serious consequences. However, she left the town before being processed, so the investigating agency decided to continue. At present, the railing has not been captured, so the investigating agency decides to suspend the investigation of the accused, when the suspect is captured, he will be returned and handled later.
|
Propose the administrative management of some officials The conclusion of the investigation also determined that Mr. Le Hoang Quan was the head of the 09 Steering Committee that approved the policy assigned to Mr. Tai to direct the implementation of the exchange in accordance with the law. The fact that Ms. Diep provided false information to the appropriate property was prosecuted. Due to her belief, Mr. Quan approved the property exchange. Mr. Quan has a part of responsibility as a boss, but at a limited level, he is not at the level of criminal management, but he proposes to manage it administratively. In addition, CQĐT also suggested handling other people. People include Mr. Tran Ha Quan (Deputy Director of Land Economics, Department of Natural Resources and Environment), Mr. Duong Trong Thao (Specialist in the Department of Public Asset Management, Department of Finance), Mr. Thai Minh Tanh (Head of the Planning Department of the Department of Culture, Sports and Tourism). These individuals have advised and proposed unit leaders who are members of Steering Committee 09 in the exchange of assets but did not propose or carry out inspections to determine the legal status of property No. 57 Cao Thang, which also has a part in their responsibility. , collaborates in advising agencies so that they agree to exchange assets. As a subordinate to comply with the direction of superiors, not for personal interests, the main responsibility belongs to the direct direction that has been processed, so the behavior of the above-mentioned people is at a limited level. recommendations for criminal management but only administrative. |
[ad_2]
