[ad_1]
“I’m not convinced to bring this up.”
“I am not convinced to bring this up,” emphasized Delegate Qua.
In addition to “having more depth, transparency and clarity,” Mr. Viet also said that the separation of the law is not contrary to the constitution, is not in conflict with other laws and is consistent with Party and state policies.
“Analyzing again and again, most of the members of the Committee (National Defense – Security) agreed to separate. Separation is more beneficial, ensures more experience, and members of the Ministry of Transport and the Ministry of Public Security agree. I support the idea of separating this law, “said Mr. Viet, adding that” some delegates who met with me also said that they should not divide, but the point is what is more beneficial for the Party or the country. Then we do it, ”Viet said.
Regarding the timing of separating the two laws, Mr. Viet also suggested that if the law is passed in 2 sessions, the tenth and eleventh period should always be done because these two laws are linked. Mr. Viet also stressed that the transfer of the driver’s license is the authority of the Government, not the law, so when discussing, delegates should not be too “heavy” on this content.
Many delegates were also concerned that they would have to move to the Ministry of Public Security, an organization would emerge (training, driving tests), but Mr. Viet said: “Actually, the institutions are socialized. it does not affect anything; with training and qualifications, the public security force has enough facilities and manpower to deploy ”.
“Ultimately, the separation of the law will help more deeply, it will demonstrate a greater sense of responsibility, so the Government passes from the Ministry of Transportation to the Ministry of Public Security. So if we issue a driver’s license, we must support it, when discussing, we must not use this as the main one, because it is not included in the law, “said Viet.
“I am a delegate, I have to speak through my ears to press the button”
Although the president of the National Defense – Security Committee said that the transfer of training and driving tests to the Ministry of Public Security was not regulated by law, but under the authority of the Government, but of the delegate Ro Mah Tuan (Gia Lai) only In article 66 of the bill to guarantee order and safety of road traffic, it is clear that the Ministry of Public Security presides over the issuance and testing of driving licenses.
“There are some questions about whether the rules should be divided; assigning the tasks of training and driving tests to the Ministry of Public Security, I want to be satisfied with (explanation). The audition must have ears, ”Tuan said.
Second, whether or not objective management principles should be guaranteed. Training, controlling and driving, kicking the ball and blowing the whistle?
Third, despite the fact that it is performing in a stable manner, but moving to the Ministry of Public Security, it is better managed, because since 1995 and before, when it was not transferred from the Ministry of Public Security to the Ministry of Transportation, the statistics of the Ministry of Transport there were 760 accidents / 100,000 licenses and from the moment of delivery to the Ministry of Transport, until 2019 there are 16 accidents / 100,000 driver’s licenses.
“So it’s okay, it’s not okay,” commented the delegates and said that the Ministry of Public Security did not dare to commit to the change to the Department of Driving Tests, there would be no false papers and traffic accidents would be reduced.
Regarding the specific evidence to show that the transition will be better, according to the participants, the explanatory report is only qualitative, subjective, without a convincing impact evaluation.
“We also support the good alone, but we must consider all the contents, which affect the tax resources of the people, the state budget to support such apparatus. I am a delegate, I have to speak through my ears to press the button, ”said Delegate Tuan.
In discussing in the team, the delegates wondered if it appears that the ministries are “dividing the work” into work. Someone even joked, the law could be split in two, but the two drafting panels should be merged into one.
[ad_2]
