[ad_1]
On December 22, the Ho Chi Minh City People’s Court announced an unfair case on the Trung Luong – Ho Chi Minh City Highway, resulting in a waste of 725 billion VND.
At 9 o’clock, President Huynh Van Truc on behalf of the Panel read the entire sentence.
The trial process and records show that Mr. Dinh La Thang (former Minister of Transport) was aware of the Dinh Ngoc system (ie “Ut bald”, former Deputy Director General of Thai Son Corporation, Ministry of Defense).
The presiding judge – Judge Huynh Van Truc, deputy head of the sentenced Criminal Court. Photo: HOANG YEN
Since then, Mr. Thang introduced the system to participate in the auction for the right to collect highway rates in Ho Chi Minh City – Trung Luong. Mr. Thang’s subordinates knew that the Yen Khanh System Company was not eligible to participate, but due to the respect of his superiors and subordinates, there were a number of violations.
Of the violations of the former defendants who are officials of the Ministry of Transportation, it allowed the Fraud System to appropriate 725 billion.
Defendant Dinh La Thang. Photo: PRAYER
Previously, the VKS challenged the Panel to request that it punish defendant Thang from 10 to 11 years in prison, Nguyen Hong Truong (former Vice Minister of the Ministry of Industry and Commerce) from 6 to 7 years in prison for violating regulations on administration and use of state property. causing loss and waste. Defendants under Mr. Thang identified with their accomplices were offered a fine of 3 to 6 years in prison.
The Defendant System is offered life in prison for fraud and property appropriation and a sentence of 13 to 14 years in prison for abusing positions and powers to influence others for selfish purposes. The remaining defendants were offered 2 to 12 years in prison for fraudulent property appropriation.
Former Vice Minister Nguyen Hong Truong. Photo: PRAYER
During the course of the trial, Mr. Thang denied all the charges and said that he was not guilty. Mr. Thang is only responsible for being the boss, responsible for the administration and believes that the criminal prosecution is unfounded …
In defending Mr. Thang, the attorneys also provided a number of grounds and evidence to show that the client’s allegation was not convincing. Furthermore, the lawyers also argue about who is the amount of 725 billion …
With the last word, Thang said that no matter what the court ruled, he also agreed. The former minister and former vice minister of the School, who have worked for more than 10 years, hope to be lenient with his subordinates.
The defendants at trial. Photo: HOANG GIANG
The Panel found that, based on the content of the case and the litigation process in court, the procedural bodies and conductors of the procedure had complied with the law and the law.
The results of the investigation were compared with the testimony of the defendants in the trial and with many other documents and sufficient evidence to confirm that the prosecution of the accusation is the right person and the true crime.
The defendant Dinh Ngoc System. Photo: HOANG GIANG
The defendant Thang, Truong and their subordinates committed violations in the sale of the right to collect high-speed tolls, which is a particular asset of great value to the State. From there, the conditions are created for the defendant to direct a series of other defendants who commit deceptive acts to appropriate state assets. As a result, it caused a loss of 725 billion VND.
The defendant system carried out a series due to the repeated allocation of tariffs. In addition, this defendant also benefited with more than 3.4 billion VND by taking advantage of the influence in the purchase of a villa in Hanoi.
The defendant Thang as minister is the head of the agency assigned to manage and use state property. However, after the State agreed in writing to assign the Ministry of Transportation to administer the toll collection right for the Trung Luong Expressway, the defendant influenced the system to participate in the auction and win the tender as mentioned above.
At the same time, the defendant allowed the Yen Khanh company to prolong the payment of the contract on the right to collect fees … The defendant Thang violated the regulations on the management and use of state assets and assumed primary responsibility …
PLO continues to update results
[ad_2]
