[ad_1]
Responsibility pile
Criticizing Dr. Koh’s point of view, Mr. Valencia argued that China did not militarize the islands and rocks in the South China Sea. Not only that, Mr. Valencia blamed the responsibility that “Vietnam and the United States have not stopped militarizing” in this maritime zone, for which China must respond. Specifically, Dr. Valencia’s article is written in the newspaper Asia Times There is a passage: “China has no intention of” militarizing “the entities (in the East Sea – NV). But as Vietnam and the United States intensify” militarization “in the South China Sea, China feels the need to respond to what Beijing sees as a threat to China’s military forces and infrastructure there.
Specifically, for about 5 years now, Chinese fighters have been regularly present on the island of Phu Lam in the Paracel archipelago. Since 2016, Beijing has also deployed an air-to-air missile system on the island, followed by an additional YJ-62 warship strike missile.
On the three artificial islands, Vanh Vai, Cross and Xu Bi in the Spratlys, China has built a lot of infrastructure. Specifically, since 2016, satellite images show that Beijing has completed the construction of a 3,000m long runway, a large hangar … on these three artificial islands. Immediately after completing the infrastructure, China sent a variety of military aircraft to the area.
Recently, the image also shows that the H-6 bomber, which can carry nuclear weapons, has also appeared on the islands and rocks of the South China Sea. This raises concerns about Beijing’s desire to use its nuclear deterrent there.
The aforementioned evidence shows that Mr. Valencia has blamed the responsibility. Similarly, in an article published on January 1, 2121, Valencia again blamed the United States and its allies for the tensions in the South China Sea, without mentioning any responsibility from China.
Cunning person
Over the years, Dr. Valencia has often published many astute articles about the South China Sea.
Normally, the article What’s really driving the South China Sea conflict (roughly translated: What causes the risk of conflict in the East Sea) published in the newspaper Asia Times On 1.11.2020, he said that the real cause of the tension, which could cause a conflict in the South China Sea, is the US military activities in this maritime zone. The article conferred on China the so-called “defense of sovereignty” in the South China Sea, even though claims Beijing made in the South China Sea was rejected by the International Court of Arbitration in 2016.
In 2018, this doctor was also harshly criticized by researchers for publishing in the newspaper The Jakarta Post that China’s illegal and destabilizing militarization actions in the South China Sea are only for “defensive” purposes because countries in the region “attract and rely on American air to provoke.” But having said that, international scholars point out that it is a fallacy.
All are to change the black and white on the causes of the tensions in the South China Sea, in order to serve China’s false sovereignty ambitions.
|
“Enchanted” propaganda In addition to the aggressive acts in the South China Sea, Beijing is also promoting propaganda activities to justify and blame the tensions in the South China Sea. Over the past two years, China has built various research centers such as the South China Sea Strategic Transparency Initiative (SCSPI) – Peking University (China), Nanhai Research Institute (how China calls the East Sea). In this way, Beijing seeks to recruit international experts to carry out irresponsible media campaigns, blaming … for the uncertainties in the South China Sea, and then paving the way to create an excuse to generate tension. Law. Noted for this hack is Dr. Mark Valencia of the Nanhai Research Institute, who constantly has articles swapping the concept to blame Vietnam and some other countries for causing trouble in the South China Sea, forcing China to go strong. . defense weapons. The Valencia articles have been strongly criticized by international researchers. |
[ad_2]
