[ad_1]
The President of the Supreme Court of Justice, Nguyen Hoa Binh, presided over the review of the appeal – Photo: GIANG LONG
On the morning of May 6, in Hanoi, the Council of Judges of the Supreme People’s Court opened a trial under the appeal procedure of the Ho Duy Hai case (35 years old, resident in Thu Thua District, Long An Province) sentenced . death sentence for 2 “Murder” and “Property theft”. The case occurred in 2008, two victims were employees of the Cau Voi post office.
Mr. Nguyen Hoa Binh, President of the Supreme Court of the Supreme Court presided over the trial. The jury is made up of 17 members.
This morning at the trial, Ho Duy Hai was not present.
Mr. Nguyen Huy Tien, Deputy Director of the Supreme People’s Procuratorate, authorized by the Chief, attended the trial.
Representatives of the Office of the President, the Judicial Committee of the National Assembly and representatives of the Central Commission for Internal Affairs attended the trial; Department C01, Ministry of Public Security …
Overview of the trial case of the Ho Duy Hai case – Photo: GIANG LONG
Investigators participating in the investigation are Mr. Le Thanh Trung (currently Chief of Police for Duc Hoa District, Long An Province); Nguyen Van Linh (currently deputy chief of the PC06 department, Long An Police) was present at the trial.
Mr. Nguyen Thanh Phong (currently Deputy Police Director of Duc Hoa District, Long An Province) is an officer investigating the case, making a search and deciding on the arrest warrant for Ho Duy Hai, who is absent.
After the trial clerk reported the results of the attendance of the invited representatives, the chief justice, Nguyen Hoa Binh, said he “was sorry” when some lawyers, prosecutors … participated in the settlement process. The case has been absent.
According to Mr. Binh, this is an important trial, an opportunity to review liability together to clarify and review the case.
The Chief Justice of the People’s Court, Nguyen Hoa Binh, said this was a particularly serious case that occurred as of January 2008, killing two employees at the Cau Voi post office, causing public anger.
The case has passed two levels of first instance and an appeal trial. After that, there was a report on the case to the Office of the President and a decision to suspend the execution of the death penalty for Ho Duy Hai.
Mother, aunt and sister Ho Duy Hai await information outside the Supreme Court from a lawyer – Photo: NAM TRAN
At the end of 2019, the Supreme People’s Procuratorate must issue a decision to appeal in accordance with the cassation for first instance and appeal sentences, requesting the Council of Judges of the Supreme People’s Court to open a cassation trial to reconsider this case.
The task of a cassation trial is that the Council of Judges will carry out examinations and evaluations of the legality of the documents contained in the documents. Mainly focused on the evidence declared in the appeal of the president of the Supreme People’s Procuratorate.
In addition, the council also reviews and clarifies new evidence and documents that judicial authorities, VKS, and attorneys can present to the Council of Judges.
If the content of the appeal is unclear, the trial may last more than 3 days.
The President of the Supreme Court of the Supreme Court also affirmed that the request made with the trial must be considered careful, objective, comprehensive and in accordance with legal procedures based on a strict, prudent and impartial trial. bad but don’t miss the crime either.
Lawyer Tran Hong Phong, who was invited to attend the trial of the Ho Duy Hai case trial, told reporters after the 6-5 morning trial – Video: NAM TRAN
Around 11:30 am, the morning trial of the first day ended. Speaking to the press after leaving court, Tran Hong Phong (defense attorney for Ho Duy Hai), said that after the Council of Judges heard the lawyer present new evidence, the president announced this afternoon. will work internally to review evidence, case file documents, case files, and unnecessary attorneys involved.
Mr. Phong submitted a request to attend the 3-day trial, but the president reported after discussing with the Council of Judges that it was not necessary to have an attorney present. The lawyer’s opinion is already presented and the Council of Judges has taken note of it.
“This morning I worked with the administrative department presenting a large amount of relevant evidence to help the Council of Judges make the best decision. Since this afternoon I was not invited to attend the hearing.” Although working internally, I hope that the cassation will review it objectively, I am sure that the council will make the best decision because the president has affirmed that he will not be mistakenly mistaken. Pham, “said lawyer Phong.
Expected, the trial is held at 8-5.
