[ad_1]
The lawyer presents the minutes of the tripartite agreement to the Panel – Photo: TM
On the afternoon of March 24, in the argument and response, Mr. Phan Trung Hoai, Ms. Duong Thi Bach Diep’s defense attorney, pointed out many differences between the Land Registry Office records provided to the trial panel yesterday and records compiled by the prosecuting agency.
At the same time, Hoai suddenly presented a new document, a 3-way agreement between Diep Bach Duong Company – Phan Thanh – Agribank.
Does the profile have 6 differences?
According to the lawyer, there are 6 Abnormal scores, profile discrepancies. TFirst of all, on the land use right certificate replacement receipt, Hoai said that on the surface the change receipt is in the file of Property registration office There is no indication in the collected investigative agency data.
Monday, 2 times of registration for security transactions and update of changes for assets 57 Cao Thang, Environmental Resources Information Center sends notices to the authorities but it is lost and is no longer stored in the facility.
Third, for the renewal report. Land use rights certificates house 57 Cao Thang (after fixing the house, Ms Diep requested a replacement Land use rights certificates update the corrected part), the lawyer analyzed the documents in the file registered on January 4, 2011, but the report was dated January 13, 2010.
In which Mr. Pham Ngoc Lien, director of the Center tdoes not believe in resources – the environment, 2 revisions dated January 20, 2010, while Mr. Doan Thanh and Mr. Dao Anh Kiet signed on January 20, 2011 and January 25, 2011.
Fourth, Agribank confirmed that it will maintain Land use rights certificates house 57 Cao Thang, but January 25, 2011 Mrs. Diep still stars Land use rights certificates at the Ben Nghe Neighborhood People’s Committee. The lawyer said that if there is a mortgage, three parties must be present when the book is returned.
Thursday, update level changed Land use rights certificates New on January 21, 2011, but warning to avoid September 26, 2011.
Friday, the mortgage file that Agribank said received on December 31, 2008. However, in the category of Property registration office Delivery is the 7-1-2009.
Unexpectedly, attorney Hoai presented the new document to the evidence panel as a tripartite agreement between the Company. Aries – Phan Thanh – Agribank. In which, the number 185 Hai Ba Trung is shown as collateral in Agribank. On September 19, 2014, the company Aries and Phan Thanh Company signed a lease for 185 Hai Ba Trung with the approval of Agribank.
Additional discussion, bà Diep expressed frustration and said that the mortgage file is false. Ms Diep said that lawyer Le Hong Nguyen (who protected Agribank) used to protect her, now defending Agribank is a conflict of interest.
Headquarters of the Light Music Center at 57 Cao Thang – Photo: QUANG DINH
The court summoned more people involved
Arguing with a lawyer, a representative of the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment confirmed that the documents in the file were real documents. In the receipt there are some contradictions, but this position said that Pham Ngoc Lien misled, but this document was signed by Mr. Kiet in 2011.
Dao Anh Kiet (former director of the Department of Natural Resources and Environment) said that he is unable to consider Land use rights certificates It is real or false. However, Mr. Kiet also explained that at that time Mr. Kiet asked whoever received the application and signed it should write an hour next to it to know how much time each person has to review the application.
The meaning of this report, according to Mr. Kiet, is the application form Land use rights certificates New, updated part of property attached to the land. In Mr. Kiet’s view, this is a mistake because Ms. Linh, Mr. Thanh and Mr. Kiet signed in 2011.
In court, the representative of the Ho Chi Minh City People’s Committee said that the city’s People’s Committee is based on the Construction Department’s proposal to establish state ownership with real estate 57 Cao Thang. In the Construction Department report, there is no information that 57 Cao Thang’s house is using a bank mortgage. According to this person, if they are mortgaging, state ownership cannot be established.
The trial panel also summons Mr. Doan Thanh, Ms. Cao Linh and Mr. Pham Ngoc Lien, who are the officials from the Department of Natural Resources and Environment who have received and signed the report. Land use rights certificates No. 57 Cao Thang to clarify the inconsistency in terms of time. At the same time, the representatives of Notary Public No. 1 were summoned to participate in the proceedings of the trial at 8:00 am on March 25.
