[ad_1]
Creating complicated circumstances, pushing the accused to justice?
During the interrogation session, the panel asked the screening room to play the videos captured by the Ho Chi Minh City police during the investigation. After viewing it, the defendant Tung admitted that all the behaviors and images in the video are correct. However, Tung confessed, his actions were not intended to infringe on other people’s accommodation, but the defendant was removing people from the Nguyen Binh Khiem 29 project there due to unsafe construction.
Video behavior of the accusedAt 3:18 p.m.: Lam Hoang Tung, Nguyen Thi Huong Tam (fugitive, wanted) and 11 security guards arrived at Nguyen Binh Khiem’s house number 29.
3:48 PM: Ms Thao’s adopted son brought Ms Thao’s son M. to stand in front of the house. 16 hours 5 minutes – 16 hours 10 minutes: 3 people who rent a room in the house 29 Nguyen Binh Khiem take turns carrying the backpack from the house … 16:21 PM Nguyen Hai Nam rides a motorcycle to take a young man to … 6:41 PM: A taxi came and parked in front of the house, Tam picked up K. from the house, Tung took S. in the back of the taxi; Nam opened the car door for Tung and Tam to lead the two children to the car. Because some people stopped, the taxi driver got out of the car; Tung, Tam got 2 kids out of the car. 6:43 PM: Nam holds K by Tam’s hand. And Tam and 3 young men came in and led Ms. Thao’s mother from the house to the door. 6:44 PM: Tam took M. out of the house. After that, Tung brought a stroller from the house outside, Nam gave K. to Tam and Tam put K. in the crib … |
In court, Tung claimed to be a co-owner of the house with Ms. Hoang Trong Anh Chi. On September 19, 2019, the defendant came to work under Ms. Chi’s authorization contract to take care of the project, manage and fix the construction violations here. Co-ownership, but not in the pink book because the parties are raw, they trust the business.
Tung Khai told him about 14:30 on September 19, 2019 to the house of 29 Nguyen Binh Khiem, he saw the door open, so he went in and explained that the building was not safe, he could not live here and asked everyone who lived in the project. far from home. After that, around 4 p.m., many people from Ms. Thao’s family gathered at the house shouting, demanding “give me back”, but the defendant said: “We take the children out to ensure safety. For the children. “. According to defendant Tung, those who shouted on September 19 were supposed to “create a difficult situation, push me and Nguyen Hai Nam into the work cycle.”
What did the defendant Nam report on the act of holding the baby?
In the defendant Nguyen Hai Nam section, after watching the program, the panel asked if the defendant participated in taking the people out of 29 Nguyen Binh Khiem’s house out of this house, the defendant replied that he could not enter the house .
“When I arrived, I saw the militia and the police standing in the street. The baby is on the street, people push, I see danger, so I protect the child. Being a person must have integrity, ”defendant Nam slammed the table when answering the panel.
The president recalled: “Nam defendant, even at trial, but he also hit the table,” the defendant said: “I do not hit the table. I inhibit. 1 year and 3 months, I did not tell myself. Let me cover everything from start to The end. I have been working for many years, I have an integrity … “Immediately afterwards, the president asked the judicial assistance police to take the accused to the seat, and at the same time explained to the accused:” The accused has the right to reply, present in court, not by attitude. yelling, hitting the table. Whether I am guilty or not is not demonstrated through shouting and beating on the table “.
In the afternoon, responding to the Panel, the defendant Nam did not admit the crime under the formal accusation and had testimonies about the evolution of the incident. Defendant Nam said that while working as a judge in the 1st District People’s Court, Tung learned about the house dispute with Ms. Thao. Nam ordered Tung to file a lawsuit against District Court 1. Much later, when the parties met, Tung said that Ms. Thao promised to return the house to Tung. “I, as a brother, work in law again, so I told Tung to turn over the house so that it was correct. One is inviting redundancy to establish diplomas, the second is inviting notaries to make contracts on the delivery of houses; make a report to inform local authorities about the receipt. I was so careful that I told Tung to be careful for fear that they (Ms. Thao’s side – PV) would let them in, “the defendant Nguyen Hai Nam introduced.
According to defendant Nam’s statement, about 2 days before the incident, Tung asked to find the redundant office and the defendant agreed to help. On September 19, 2019, Tung called to report that someone was causing trouble, refused to turn over the house and “asked for help,” then defendant Nam called Mr. Tran Hai Dang (Head of Da Police Department Kao, District 1). .
“At 4:20 pm, I went to see the police, the office was working again, so I went out for coffee. 2 hours later, Tung called to order a taxi. When a taxi came, I saw people pushing each other to hold the baby, I picked up a baby because no one was accepting it, ”said Nguyen Hai Nam.
Today, the trial continues with the discussion.
[ad_2]
