[ad_1]
Defendant Lam Hoang Tung: ‘Taking 3 children out of the house is for safety …’
In court, the defendant Lam Hoang Tung stated that the behavior according to the indictment was described as incomplete.
Specifically, the defendant Tung claimed, around 2:30 p.m. on September 19, the defendant arrived at the home of 29 Nguyen Binh Khiem (P. Da Kao, District 1), at that time the door was open and the defendant returned to invite the Office of Law Enforcement. District 1 (HCMC) came to witness.
“The defendant came for the purpose of managing, repairing and overcoming the construction violations of the house at the request of the Inspector of the Department of Construction,” stated defendant Tung.
Before asking the people in the house to leave the house, Tung Khai explained to the occupants that the building was not safe, he could not live here, and had to be relocated.
At the same time, about taking 3 children out of the house, Tung stated that the purpose was to ensure the safety of the children.
“At around 4 pm, many people from Ms. Thao’s family gathered at the house, shouting ‘give me back my son.’ We do them to make sure they are safe. At that time, Mr. Nam (defendant Nguyen Hai Nam – PV) was also present, so I asked Mr. Nam to help a child. The investigative agency determined that Mr. Nam was my accomplice was not correct. Nam and I did not discuss anything, ”said the defendant Tung.
Lam Hoang Tung said that he did not know who the person in the yellow jersey was in the clip. |
In addition, the defendant Lam Hoang Tung filed between Tung and Ms. Hoang Trong Anh Chi, who contributed capital to buy the house, the capital contribution ratio was 50-50, the defendant spent about 9 billion VND. The defendant’s arrival at the home is an authorized contract from Ms. Chi to care for the project, manage and remedy the construction violations here.
In court, Nguyen Hai Nam presented advances, the timing of the incident according to the prosecution is yes, but the mentioned prosecution act is not.
The president asked, “After September 19, did the defendant enter and leave the house, talk to Ms. Thao?” The defendant Nguyen Hai Nam replied, “No.”
The president then asked the Department to show and replay the videos collected during the investigation of the defendants’ behavior. After the show, the defendant Lam Hoang Tung admitted that all the actions and images in the video were correct. About the person in the yellow shirt in the picture, Tung said that he didn’t know who this person was.
Defendant Nguyen Hai Nam: “Human must have integrity”
After viewing the video shown in court, the defendant Nguyen Hai Nam stated: “The defendant held the baby because he thought the child would be in danger. Tung asked that the defendant be arrested, the defendant was arrested … “.
When the president asked some more questions about the defendant’s behavior in the clip, around after September 19, Nguyen Hai Nam walked in and out of the house, speaking with Ms. Thao (standing outside the door), before the video. Upon being shown in court, the defendant Nam claimed that he did not speak to Ms. Thao after September 19, when the defendant Nam responded in a state of agitation and loudly.
After that, the defendant Nguyen Hai Nam hit the table and said: “A human must have integrity, how many years have I been working. I see the baby is dangerous, I hold the baby. And they (only those of Ms. . Thao) kept yelling … “
At that time, the President said, “I note that the accused cannot answer like this” and the President asked the police for legal assistance in placing the accused Nam in the seating position.
Two defendants Nguyen Hai Nam (right) and Lam Hoang Tung in court |
The president explained to the defendant Nam: “The defendant has the right to answer and speak in court, not through the attitude of yelling and banging on the table. Whether I am guilty or not is not shown by shouting and banging on the table ”.
The defendant Nguyen Hai Nam replied: “1 year and 3 months I had an injustice. I used to work, I have my integrity, why do I do that? “
[ad_2]
