[ad_1]
Defendants Lam Hoang Tung and Nguyen Hai Nam arrived in court on December 29 – Photo: QUANG DINH
Still judgment despite absent damage
On the morning of December 29, Mr. Nguyen Hai Nam was transferred from the hospital to the court. However, when asked about his health, Mr. Nam said that he was healthy and that he wanted the case to be tried. “It was a year, two months and eight days, they told the defendant it was too much,” Nam said.
Meanwhile, Ms. Hoang Thi Thu Thao (who is determined to be the victim) is absent and has a request to postpone the trial. Ms. Thao asked to be absent due to serious illness and poor psychology.
Ms. Hoang Trong Anh Chi (landlord 29 Nguyen Binh Khiem) was cited by the court as a person with related rights and obligations, present in court.
The defendant Lam Hoang Tung has 7 defense attorneys. Defendant Tung’s defense attorney proposed to summon persons related to the case, such as: Chief Inspector of the Ho Chi Minh City Construction Department, District 1 Construction Office, Chairman of the District 1 People’s Committee, Chairman of the Da Kao District People’s Committee, Urban Order Team, Chief of District 1 Police Department, Mr. Giang Thanh, who was allowed illegally into 29 Nguyen Binh Khiem House by Ms. Thao.
Furthermore, the attorney also asked the Panel to issue an accompanying decision if Ms. Thao was deliberately absent. Defendant Nguyen Hai Nam’s defense attorney also asked the court to summon the Da Kao District Police Chief and change the deterrent measures against Mr. Nguyen Hai Nam.
Regarding the request to subpoena the Da Kao neighborhood police chief, the Panel said that the investigating agency had summoned this person before to take testimony. Consequently, the Da Kao District Police Chief said he did not know what happened at the crime scene. Therefore, the Panel said that the Da Kao district police chief was not a witness to the case, so he did not convene.
The attorneys thought it necessary to summon Ms. Thao to trial, but the Panel said that the trial would be adjudicated in the absence of harm due to her full testimony during the investigation and therefore did not accept the attorney’s request. as a request to postpone the trial of the accused.
Violation of accommodation for civil disputes
House 29 Nguyen Binh Khiem (District 1) is owned by Ms. Hoang Trong Anh Chi. Ms. Chi signed a contract to receive batteries with Ms. Thao, handing over the unfinished house to Ms. Thao for construction. During the construction process, Ms. Thao’s side committed violations and was punished.
In September 2018, Ms. Thao continued to hire a construction unit to complete the house and in March 2016, Ms. Thao and her children moved here.
The sale and purchase between the two parties could not continue due to the dispute, the demand for the deposit was accepted by the People’s Court of District 1.
At around 2:00 pm on September 19, 2019, both Mr. Lam Hoang Tung (Ms. Chi’s cousin) and Nguyen Hai Nam (Tung’s friend) and some people broke into 29 Nguyen Binh Khiem’s home. to kick people out of the house and take over the house. in. Subsequently, Ms. Thao sent a petition to the authorities to report the incident.
On the night of October 1, 2016, the District 1 police prosecuted the accused and arrested Nguyen Hai Nam and Lam Hoang Tung.
The trial continues.
