[ad_1]
This week, Supreme Court justices asked Pennsylvania Secretary General Kathy Boockvar and the other defendants to respond to the issues from the earlier appeal before the January 22, 2021 deadline. Two days later of the inauguration.
Earlier, Trump’s team asked the court to order the other side of the case to respond on December 23 and issue a ruling on January 6, 2021. However, the Supreme Court did not follow this recommendation.
This means that by the time Ms. Boockvar and others responded to the appeal, President-elect Joe Biden was already in office. The court can then reject the judgment because the resolution at that time was null or impossible. Congress will count the electoral votes and confirm the next president on January 6.
However, Trump’s team argued that even the day of the inauguration would not make the trial “useless”, as the above problems could occur in the future and therefore should be resolved by the court. prior to.
President Donald Trump’s private attorney, Rudy Giuliani. Photo: AP
In a statement released over the weekend, Trump’s side quoted Judge Samuel Alito as expressing doubts about whether Pennsylvania’s judiciary was unconstitutional in adjusting the state’s presidential election law.
“This appeal was made because of a related case in Pennsylvania, in which Judge Alito and two other judges considered the constitutionality of the state court’s decision to extend the statutory period for receiving votes. Voting between 8:00 p.m. elections 3-11 at 17:00 of the following 3 days The constitutionality of the court’s decision is of national importance and it is likely that the decision of the State Supreme Court violates the Federal Constitution “- quoted Mr. Rudy Giuliani lawyer Trump.
Trump’s team of running backs is looking for a way for the judge to overturn three Pennsylvania Supreme Court rulings on signature verification, the right to substantially monitor the voting process, and specific requirements. information on how voters fill out their ballots.
Bao hanh
[ad_2]
