[ad_1]
For example, the current Panorama façade creates the feeling of 3 stories on this driveway. Meanwhile, the design drawing image has only one floor. The roof of the block currently uses the Thai roof, while the drawing has drawn the native yin and yang roof. “Maybe it’s because the owner wants to save money and wants more space,” said the architect.
Also by comparing drawings, explaining the renovation plan, it can be seen that the current image of the project is not the same as the design. For example, the alternative explanation suggests that it is necessary to reduce the heavy load on the rock ledge at Ma Pi Leng. Therefore, the walls will be removed, the house will not have the function of accommodation and accommodation. However, in today’s controversial Panorama image, the walls that cover the room are still not removed.
The panoramic building after the renovation is said to be more monumental than before |
Regarding the controversy surrounding this project, Vice Minister of Culture, Sports and Tourism Hoang Dao Cuong said that he had directed the Heritage Department to consider and resolve the issue surrounding the Panorama building in East Ma Pi Leng. Consequently, if there are any errors in the construction, the Ministry will propose to handle.
A heritage architecture expert also said that, at best, Panorama should remove the protective walls to create less heavy ventilation that affects the landscape of the area. That will also reduce the load on the rocky areas of the bearings here.
Meanwhile, associate professor TS Khuat Tan Hung (Hanoi University of Architecture) said that the existence of Panorama works in Ma Pi Leng is a dangerous decision. Consequently, it leaves a bad precedent for illegal construction and it still exists. This will make this path look more like people’s works.
[ad_2]
