[ad_1]
Many people believe that Panorama Ma Pi Leng disguises itself after violating the surface and making the landscape worse than the old building.
All the controversy over the past year about Panorama – house in Ma Pi Leng (Ha Giang) pass is due to many people claiming that it negatively affects the surrounding landscape. And although it is beyond the fault of the national milestone, it is a “four zero project”:
It works without investment certificates. The project has not been approved by a competent authority. Ms. Vu Ngoc Anh (investor) has not been granted a change of land use from annual crops to residential land, construction. The work has not had a construction permit either. While unauthorized and controversial, the work was legalized and allowed to be repaired to better suit the landscape.
After many photos taken Panorama Mã Pi Leng has been repaired Spread on social networks, many people wonder about the scale of superficial editing work than the previous one, considering it the “stain” of nature. And again controversial.
Panorama before and after the edition. Image: Facebook.
My friend used to walk this way and, like some others, he was very supportive of the presence of the Panorama house here. Their argument is that in the middle of a long mountain pass, it is very necessary to make a stop in the middle of the road. If the vehicle has run out of gas or is damaged, there is a shelter awaiting rescue. Then have a place to rest, have a view to see the majesty of the mountains and the Nho River, which is also what tourists need.
As for me, although I do not admire Confucius, a very ancient Chinese philosopher, I have a lot of respect and respect for his legitimacy. That theory can be summarized and deployed that man and things must be in their inherent position in society because “The name is the correct language.” The name was not correct, all speech and justification does not make sense.
So, from the moment the controversy started, I thought it was impossible to legalize and erase this Panorama house with “the need and the need for a group of tourists.” Allowing a “four zero” scheme to continue to exist is a bad precedent and rather a legal challenge. The law does not allow it, it cannot be done. Unauthorized construction works must be dismantled. If everyone learns from the owner of Panorama, then just rush to the landscapes, build the pre-show type, get discovered, will it be erased or not?
It is also because there is no permission, there is no fair word, the explanations of the authorities and the investor are difficult to make others accept. The road from Dong Van to Meo Vac, although deserted and attractive, is not an abandoned road in the jungle. Therefore, when the investor is building, what action did the authorities have to control and prevent?
We also talk a lot about investment and tourism development. But going from text on paper to thinking and acting seems quite a long way off. Everyone knows that this road needs a place to rest, so the tourism industry seems not to have quickly understood the needs of tourists.
Also because it is not legitimate, so although it is legalized and repaired by changing the color of the building to the gray color of stone, the architecture appears to be “softer” than the surrounding landscape than before. But public opinion will say that it is broader, more superficial.
And what troubled me forever, the punishment was also punished. The owner modified the project, but we will “erase the crime” for Panorama Ma Pi Lèng type what?
>>The article does not necessarily coincide with the opinions of VnExpress.net. Destination here.
