[ad_1]
Being accused of using deceptive tricks to deceive, appropriating the amount of more than 725 billion from the Ministry of Transport, but in court Dinh Ngoc System declared that he did not know where that money was going.
This morning (December 19), the trial of Mr. Dinh La Thang, Nguyen Hong Truong (former Deputy Minister of Transport) and the defendants continued the debate.
In presenting the defense to the defendant Dinh La Thang, the lawyers do not agree with the point of prosecution of the VKS. According to the lawyers, VKS is not objective, it does not fit the real situation at trial.
According to the lawyers, through the judicial process, the defendant admitted the behavior but did not instruct the employee to falsify the file, to cheat, but to order the employee to put the file to tender.
 |
| Mr. Dinh La Thang |
After winning the auction, Yen Khanh Company paid VND 2,004 billion in full to the Ministry of Transportation. During the auction process, no company participates in the auction and no company bids above the Yen Khanh company, so this auction is conducted in accordance with the regulations.
Regarding the fraud, the prosecution found that the defendant used software to interfere with the toll collection management software of the Ministry of Transportation to appropriate the amount of 725 billion VND. However, the indictment does not indicate from whom the money was taken, at what point? Neither the accusation nor the conclusions of the investigation were determined.
“Both the conclusion of the investigation and the prosecution’s indictment conclude that this amount is a fee, so it is also the Yen Khanh company that will put this amount on the books or off the books,” emphasized the lawyer.
Also according to the lawyer, Yen Khanh Company has paid in full the contract amount 2,004 billion VND and the late payment penalty, Cuu Long Corporation has filed a lawsuit in court.
 |
| The accused Dinh Ngoc System |
Defending himself, the defendant Dinh Ngoc System apologized to the prosecuting agency. According to the defendant, during the investigation, the defendant stated that all the property belonged to the defendant’s nephew, but in fact, that property belonged to the defendant.
He also admitted that he lied to the investigating agency that defendant Pham Van Diet bought the right to collect the fee himself, but was in fact ordered by the System.
Explaining this lie, The system stated in 2017, when he was arrested and prosecuted, the defendant Diet said that “because he had run the entire bidding process, he must understand the matter clearly, let Kiet accept it for him.”
The defendant system denied the two charges that VKS has processed. According to the defendant, the crime of “Abuse of positions and powers against others for lust”, in the purchase of a cheap chalet in Licogi 13 is not correct.
According to Us, the defendant bought this royal house from the beginning of 2013 and until the beginning of 2014, Licogi 13 made the tender package for the Viet Tri bridge.
“When I faced Mr. Pham Van Thang (CEO of Licogi 13), I learned that Mr. Thang made the bidding documents. When I made the purchase contract for the house, I did not fully know that Licogi 13 participated in this package ”.
Regarding the crime of “fraudulent appropriation of goods”, the system declared that the total participation in the tender was assigned to Pham Van Diet.
“Only when they processed me did I know there was a lie. Now, wherever this money is going, I really want to know (VND 725 billion amount). I hope the Panel can help, ”said Dinh Ngoc System.
The system went on to claim that it did not ask Mr. Dinh La Thang, or anyone else, the impact of approaching the HCMC-Trung Luong highway toll collection project.
According to the prosecution, through his personal acquaintances, Mr. Dinh La Thang influenced Duong Tuan Minh (former CEO of Cuu Long Company) to create the conditions to win the auction for the right to collect tolls for Ho Chi roads Minh. Salary.
In the process of implementing the contract, taking advantage of the relationship with Dinh La Thang, Dinh Ngoc System did not pay the correct amount under the contract to acquire the right to charge fees. On time, in October 2014, Yen Khanh Company had to pay the full amount of 2,004 billion VND, but it was not completed until March 2017.
Using deceptive tricks, from January 1, 2014 to December 2018, System and its accomplices concealed the actual fee income, appropriating 725 billion VND.
In this case, in addition to being accused of allocating 725 billion dong of fees, Ut “bald” is also accused of negotiating for Mr. Pham Van Thang (Managing Director of Licogi 13 Joint Stock Company) to execute the XL package. 01. -3. In return, Mr. Pham Van Thang will sell cheap to Ut’s “bald” BT01 villa, helping the defendant make more than 3.4 billion in profit.
Dinh La Thang: The accusation of ‘putting fire in the hands of the people’
To defend himself, Mr. Dinh La Thang said that the prosecution’s accusation was a “heavenly” accusation, “setting fire and leaving people’s hands”.
Thanh Phuong
