The flight attendant was hit by Mercedes: ‘1,400 million is waterproof when I can not hold my baby’ | Lifetime

The Court declared Phong sentenced to 7 years and 6 months in prison

After the court ruling, the host said she would appeal because the court sentence was too light because Phong had many aggravating circumstances that were not clarified at trial. Furthermore, the attitude of Phong and his family since the accident happened until now without a doubt further infuriated the host and the audience.

“I lose a lot of things forever, I can’t hold my baby and take care of myself”

December 17 in the morning, share with PV YouthMs. Nguyen Thi Bich Huong said that she had been waiting, waiting long at the Mercedes driver’s trial, but after 2 days trying to sit in court, she was shocked when the court handed down the sentence too light for “the there is no humanity “.

According to the presenter, the court has not analyzed in depth the issues that the defense attorney for her legal rights and interests raised at the trial. “Before the trial, someone told me that the Phong family would rather spend money on outside things (like changing the name of the house, compensating the landscaping company for 29 million VND for broken phoenix trees, 150 million VND). for the Mercedes car rental service), but has not compensated the two directly injured victims. I was skeptical, but until my attorney made it clear that the details were not in the prosecution at trial, I realized they must be true words, “she shared.

Regarding the compensation amount of more than 1.4 billion VND, Ms. Huong said that it was only the cost of treating consecutive surgeries for almost 1 year and the loss of income during that time.

The flight attendant has undergone painful surgeries in the past year and will have to continue

Speaking of which, the hostess froze with excitement, her voice gradually decreased: “79% of my health is permanently unable to recover, my dream job is now permanently abandoned, I like to lose the whole accident, carry the baby and take care of the child could not be done. After the accident, there is an irreparable mental loss ”.

With his last words in court, Phong apologized and promised to try to compensate the two victims after the sentence was carried out. The host also wondered, “If I wait until Phong gets out of jail to go to work, then I can fix it, so it’s okay if Phong can’t do it. Currently, Phong also has an apartment property that is transferred to his mother, why did Phong not take the apartment to compensate the victim first, then he went to jail to work to earn money and then to buy again, but forced to the victim to wait like this? ? ”.

For the above reasons, the flight attendant and the lawyer protecting their rights and interests said they would appeal.

Transfer apartment to?

LS Thao said the above sentence is not commensurate with the nature and gravity of the defendant Nguyen Tran Hoang Phong’s crime, not enough to discourage or show the seriousness of the law. Therefore, the level of appeal must consider that the appeal of the victim has a stricter sentence, consistent with the nature and crime of the accused.

During the trial, Mr. Thao also proposed to the Panel that it consider transferring the defendant’s apartment to his mother while in detention to serve the investigation. What is the purpose of moving the apartment while the claims of the victims are not addressed?

Bich Huong was on crutches and went to court alone

Although, the law does not prohibit the transfer of property during the period of detention because at that time the defendant has not yet been convicted, so it is not a crime. But with respect to the signing of the assignment at this point and in this case, the aggrieved party and the LS have the right to suspect this assignment.

In this regard, the Panel noted that related parties can initiate a civil lawsuit, requesting a competent court to declare the transfer contract invalid. You can then apply to a competent state agency or a court of competent jurisdiction to seize the property under the defendant’s jurisdiction to enforce compensation for the actual damage incurred and damages to the injured parties.

The defendant’s mother was crying and drowning in court

LS Nguyen Hoai Nghia asked the court to consider the joint responsibility of the person who delivered the vehicle to the person who does not have sufficient conditions to drive like Phong. Car rental contracts from Mr. P. to Fumita Company – Khang Gia – HTS (Jet, real name is Nguyen Tran Hoang Phong) are not in accordance with the law, violate the content of the form, against the regulations . Under the law. There are no records, vouchers, accounting books, tax reports … to determine that there are real transactions, companies do not have the function of renting motor vehicles (without a driver) so the vehicle owner, these companies are at fault Therefore, they must be jointly obliged to compensate for the damage caused by the source of extreme danger.

However, the Panel believes that the parties involved and the accused have entered into a civil transaction to transfer the use of the property; On the other hand, the party renting the car does not know Nguyen Tran Hoang Phong – the Mercedes driver misled himself as a fake certificate. Therefore, there is not a sufficient basis to consider joint and several criminal liability with the lessor of the vehicle.

Currently the lawyer and the hostess are going through the appeal process in court.