[ad_1]
About Yen Khanh Company, Mr. Dinh La Thang also replied: “When I go to the highway, I see that Yen Khanh Company is going to know that Yen Khanh Company buys the right to charge that fee.”
|
Mr. Dinh La Thang and Ut “bald” again appeared in court for irregularities in the highway project. |
Change the testimony after CQĐT has given the call list.
Regarding the charge of calling the defendant Duong Tuan Minh (former CEO of Cuu Long Company), Mr. Dinh La Thang confirmed that he called, but it was a call between superiors and subordinates, not for an introduction.
However, when questioned by the Panel, Defendant Minh claimed that Mr. Thang called Minh to introduce him to the Dinh Ngoc System company. Mr. Dinh La Thang asked the Panel to introduce himself to him in detail.
Mr. Dinh La Thang said: “In statements in the record and at trial, defendants Minh and System confirmed that I did not present Yen Khanh System or Company to address and participate in the project to sell the rights to charge fees. Highway; As Mr. Minh stated in court, in August 2012, when the project was assigned to Cuu Long Corporation, there was no reason why in February 2012 I called Mr. Minh to discuss the project; This project is until 10.2013 is still a project managed by the Ministry of Transport and the Ministry has decided to create an auction council (City Hall). Therefore, the governor of the project is the Ministry of Transportation and a member of the auction council is 7 people, of which Mr. Minh is only one member. And like Minh Khai, Minh also has no role. Therefore, there is no reason to call Minh. “
Mr. Dinh La Thang denied the introduction of “bald” to address the highway toll purchase project in Ho Chi Minh City – Trung Luong |
“I affirm that the accusation mentions me because of a relationship with this person that is not correct. This allegation is deductive, imputable. Since then, blaming me is completely false, it is not true ”, presented Mr. Dinh La Thang in court.
In court, Mr. Thang said during the investigation “Mr. Minh used to testify in April 2012, I called Mr. Minh about the content of the Thai Son Company presentation, but in August 2012, during the confrontation, Mr. Minh changed his testimony that in February 2012, as the indictment mentions, as far as I know, after having the CQĐT phone list, Mr. Minh changed his declaration period, because there was no called in April. Sorry Mr. Minh, I don’t mean to offend Mr. Minh, but this is the reality, so I’d like to explain. Another problem is that Mr. Minh said that Ut (ie Dinh Ngoc System – PV) brought alcohol after Yesterday, both Ut and Minh claimed to have come to Cuu Long Company before the auction. And Ut said about the project after the TV station published information about the project, it is completely logical. ”
“The accusation is only one part correct, 5 parts wrong”
That is the assertion of Mr. Dinh La Thang when the president tried him on the content of the indictment.
According to Mr. Thang, the accusation is partially correct, by mentioning that he is the Minister, the head of the Ministry of Transport, he should be responsible for all the activities of the industry. “But it is only partially true that I am politically and administratively responsible, but saying that I am always responsible for criminals, I am not responsible. For example, for traffic accidents to increase, the responsibility of the Ministry of Transport” is before the National Assembly , government. But a specific traffic accident cannot be held criminally liable by me, “presented the defendant Dinh La Thang.
Representing VKS in the morning session on December 16 |
According to Mr. Dinh La Thang: “It is not correct to assign me the responsibility role as leadership.” According to Mr. Thang, for the whole project, he only signed 2 documents and addressed 1 document, the address cannot be called through.
“In August 2011, I signed a document to present to the Prime Minister agreeing to take over the project after the BIDV Corporation returned, interrupted the investment; In October 2013, I just signed the decision to establish an auction council; There is a directive that until June 2015, Mr. The (Nguyen Van The – at that time he was Deputy Minister of Transport, now Minister of Transport) has presented me with a document on the delay in payment of Yen Khanh Company. And I criticized right there, asking Mr. The to instruct the parties to comply with the signed contract, in accordance with the law. However, it is necessary to clarify the responsibilities of state management agencies, investors and related agencies, ”said Mr. Dinh La Thang in court.
The trial of the defendant Dinh La Thang and his accomplices continues with questioning.
What does Dinh La Thang say about the “5 wrong parts” of the indictment?According to Mr. Dinh La Thang, First, The Ministry of Transport has many projects and during Mr. Thang’s time as Minister there are 6 Vice Ministers and he is assigned specific tasks, in charge of each field and specific projects. Therefore, the specialized deputy minister is the one who directs it at all times, not you. 2nd, on the responsibility of assigning tasks, Mr. Thang presented not directly assign any vice minister, but depending on the assigned fields and tasks, the vice ministers should do so. “I did not call Mr. Truong to tell him that he took over this project. As for the allegation that I assigned the project to Cuu Long Corporation, it is incorrect. I do not deliver, but the deputy minister. Third, Regarding the relationship, Mr. Thang stated “no impact”. Fourth, for the amount of 725 billion VND, Mr. Thang said that “this is in another case, I cannot be held responsible because this is fraud to avoid income.” Thursday, According to Mr. Thang, this is an auction project, so the implementation should be based on the guiding documents of the Ministry of Finance, it is impossible to incorporate the bidding rules in this project. “So the accusation of my behavior and of the defendants under the Ministry of Transport of violating the tender circular is not correct,” said Mr. Dinh La Thang.
|
[ad_2]
