[ad_1]
HCMCFormer army lieutenant colonel Dinh Ngoc System, who opposed the accusation, said that it “did not completely ask Dinh La Thang to introduce the Trung Luong Highway toll auction.”
On the afternoon of December 15, the Ho Chi Minh City People’s Court continued the trial of the Dinh Ngoc system (ie “Bald”, 49 years old, former deputy director of Thai Son Corporation, Ministry of Defense); Former Transport Minister (MOT) Dinh La Thang and those accused of wrongdoing in selling the right to collect tolls for the Trung Luong Highway, “intercepted” 725 billion VND from the state.
In which, Mr. System is accused of ordering his subordinates to falsify the financial statements of the Yen Khanh and Khanh An companies (established by the System, from profit to loss) and many other documents to qualify for the match. the purchase price of the express toll right.
When called by the court, Mr. System did not wait for the president to ask questions, he would like to introduce himself “in a minute.” The former military lieutenant colonel said the accusation was not correct; Some testimonies of the defendants Vu Thi Hoan (I call him his uncle), Pham Van Diet (CEO of the Yen Khanh company, established by the System) … are also incorrect.
“The defendant did not fully ask Dinh La Thang to introduce Duong Tuan Minh (CEO of Cuu Long Company, a high-speed management unit, under the Ministry of Transport) to tender for roads …”, said System . .
The President interrupted, asking the accused to respond to the questions raised by the Panel.
Regarding the preparation of documents to buy the right to collect tolls for Trung Luong Highway, the declaration system, he himself said that Diet learned about the Cuu Long company to participate in the auction, requested to pay the correct price Cuu Long Company published a 2.004 billion newspaper. “The defendant was unaware that Diet made false files for the Yen Khanh and Khanh An companies,” System said. He also said that all of these two companies had been assigned to Diet, so he knew of no “profit or loss.”
The president harshly: “The defendant said so, can you hear it? What is the defendant’s purpose in creating the company for other people to run, the profit he doesn’t know?”
The former military lieutenant colonel repeatedly offered to “give the accused a minute of introduction,” but the president continued to ask questions. The system admitted that, after winning the auction, Diet reported, but when the Yen Khanh Company collected the fee, the defendant did not direct the fraudulent acts, bought the Xuan Phi Company software to hide the income, or even the report. data, collection of annual fees …
In response to the panel’s questioning, the defendant Duong Tuan Minh stated that the Ministry of Transportation assigned Cuu Long Company to establish a project to sell the right to collect the Trung Luong Highway tariff. The permanent team helps The auction council has the right to charge fees, led by Ms Duong Thi Tram Anh, announced the auction of the units to access and submit files … Therefore, when the Yen Khanh company presented the auction documents, Minh did not know. “Mr. Dinh La Thang called me to introduce me that there was Mr. Anh from Thai Son Company of the Ministry of National Defense who wanted to learn some jobs related to auctioning and selling toll collection rights”, Minh Khai.
The defendant clearly recognized the regulations on the sale of state property, but due to the influence of Mr. Dinh La Thang, he knew that Dinh Ngoc had a personal relationship with Mr. Thang, he also received the address from the deputy minister. Nguyen Hong Truong should have implemented legal procedures to auction the right to collect tolls for the Trung Luong Highway.
Tomorrow the court continues to function.
In the indictment, System was accused of asking Mr. Dinh La Thang to call Duong Tuan Minh to arrange a time for him to work. Two days later, the system called Minh, claiming to be “Ut at Thai Son Company” and was introduced by the Minister. Minh will schedule a week later. However, Mr. Thang continued to call Minh, asked him to arrange a specific time, and then transferred the phone to the system to speak directly.
Dinh Ngoc System clearly knows that the regulation of participating in the auction of the right to charge high-speed rates is that the company must have a healthy financial position and have no business losses for two consecutive years … while Yen Khanh and Khanh An Company of the System in 2011 -2012 The business is in a loss, it does not have the financial capacity to pay the winning money from the auction. Consequently, System and Diet went to the Minh room twice to request support for the Yen Khanh company.
The investigating agency determined that in the Ho Chi Minh City – Trung Luong road collection process, Mr. System also instructed his subordinates to carry out many fraudulent acts to hide income. seized more than 725 billion from the state.
In 2014, Yen Khanh Company only used pre-installed software from the Ministry of Transportation and allowed staff to collect tickets left by drivers passing through the station to collect and remove the serial number, reprint new tickets with the same serial number. tickets collected. This is done manually.
In 2015, after the actual toll collection data was reported to be much higher, the reduction in revenue from manual ticket collection was ineffective, Xuan Phi Company’s software purchase address system to replace software . of the Ministry of Transport in 4 stations of the highway, in order to hide the income, appropriating the collection of the toll. At the same time, after the 5-year collection period expires, Yen Khanh Company reports the collection of the loss to continue to request the extension of the collection of the fee and the amount to be paid to buy the collection rights of the fee is less than the purchased price.
The results of the survey determined that the real revenues from 2014 to 2018 in 4 high-speed stations were more than 3,266 billion VND, but the adjustment of the system and accomplices was more than 2,541 billion VND, appropriating the difference .
Duong trang