[ad_1]
Defendant Phong in court on the afternoon of December 15 – Photo: DANANAN
On the afternoon of December 15, the Phu Nhuan District People’s Court (Ho Chi Minh City) continued adjudicating a traffic accident caused by Nguyen Tran Hoang Phong, a Mercedes driver to kill Mr. Le Manh Thuong (Seize the driver) and be Nguyen Thi Bich Huong (Vietnam Airlines flight attendant) 79% disabled.
The prosecution recommended 6-7 years in prison
Speaking of the points of accusation in court, the representative of the Phu Nhuan District Civil Engineering Institute said that in this case, the fault was entirely with the defendant Phong.
The defendant is well aware that the act of using his fake driver’s license is wrong, but he deliberately violates it, so it is necessary to strictly handle deterrence and education. However, according to the VKS representative, during the investigation, the defendant voluntarily surrendered, made a sincere statement, and accepted all the requests for compensation from the two victims.
Since then, the VKS has proposed a prison term of 6 to 7 years for the defendant Nguyen Tran Hoang Phong for violating road traffic regulations. In addition, the VKS asked the court to accuse the accused of fully complying with the victim’s request for civil compensation.
VKS representatives carry out court processing – Photo: DANANAN
The lawyer recommends clarifying the use of false driver’s licenses and the use of drugs.
Speaking in court, attorneys protecting the rights of victims recommend that the Panel consider the civil liability of the parties involved.
Consequently, Mr. Vo Van Phuc’s Mercedes car signed a rental agreement for the Fumita Company. However, Fumita Company violated the contract. Specifically, under the contract, there is no provision that allows Fumita to allow Khang Gia Company to continue subleasing. As for Mr. Thanh (Khang Gia’s company), he trusted the defendant Phong too much, and inadvertently rented a car without verifying his driver’s license.
Between these two companies, there must be joint responsibility with the accused and the accused himself to carry out the responsibility to compensate the victims.
In addition, the lawyers also said that it is necessary to add details that do not help the victim, deliberately fleeing from the accused.
For the act of using false papers, the fact that the investigating agency believes that it cannot be collected so there is no basis for handling it is not convincing. Lawyers said that based on the defendant’s testimony, the person who used the information from the false driver’s license and the car rental was sufficient to consider the act of using false papers.
Regarding drug use, the lawyers asked to determine the time of the accident, whether the defendant used drugs or not.
From there, the lawyers asked the court to return the case file to further investigate the above facts.
