[ad_1]
On the morning of December 15, the Ho Chi Minh City – Trung Luong highway collection-related violation panel Trung Luong caused more than 725 billion VND in damage, continued to question defendants who were accomplices of the Dinh Ngoc System.
In court, defendant Pham Van Diet (in court for the crime of “fraudulent appropriation of property”) admitted that the defendant did everything under the direction of the Defendant System.
This defendant testified to Yen Khanh Company by defendant Vu Thi Hoan (former director of Yen Khanh Company, defendant’s nephew) mentioned in the papers. Thus, the defendant Hoan is the one who signed all the important papers. In addition, the defendant admitted participating directly in the auction and participating in the contract for the sale of the rights to collect fees. “But everything that was arranged by the defendant System before, the defendant just signed” – the defendant died.
After the Yen Khanh Company won the auction and then exploited the right to collect the HCM City – Trung Luong highway, the defendant Diet participated in a meeting to discuss how to cut and hide the revenue at the toll booths. After that, Diet approved the payment method based on the intervention data and actual income.
Dinh Ngoc System entered the courtroom (Photo: HOANG Trieu)
According to the indictment, the defendant Pham Van Diet and Dinh Ngoc System went directly to Cuu Long Company to approach and participate in the auction to buy the right to collect the HCM City – Trung Luong highway. Kiet was well aware of the financial capacity profile of the Yen Khanh forge company to build trust and legalize the auction documents. According to Dinh Ngoc System, defendant Diet participated directly in the auction and attended the signing of the contract to sell the rights to collect fees.
Defendant Diet claimed that he did not benefit from the amount of money that defendant Dinh Ngoc System “drained” into the toll booths (more than VND 725 billion).
Defendant Dinh La Thang (Photo: HOANG Trieu)
Similarly, defendant Nguyen Thi Kim Hue (former accountant for Yen Khanh Company) claimed that Dinh Ngoc System was the true owner of Yen Khanh Company. Since working, the accused does not accept the duties directly from the System, but only follows the assignment of the direct leader in the company.
Initially, this defendant was unaware of the figures for the HCM City – Trung Luong highway as well as the software installed on the computer to hide the error in the toll collection process. After a while, the defendant got to know the old technology software. However, defendant Hue admitted: “Defendant knows that Yen Khanh Company has two book systems: books that store real data and books that store data on computers.”
Like the defendant Diệt, the defendant insists that she herself does not benefit from the lost money; only working for salary.
The Panel conducts the interrogation (Photo: HOANG Trieu)
Defendant Ngo Ba Thang (former director of Yen Khanh Company, Long An branch) submitted that the defendant took on the task of managing the staff at the branch, including the toll stations. Defendant Thắng never followed defendant Hoan’s instructions. The defendant knew that it was wrong to install the software on the computer, but the defendant had no opinion. Because the defendant sees himself as a wage earner.
Defendant Dinh Ngoc System used a corporate legal entity (manipulated by the system, including Yen Khanh Company) to auction the right to collect tolls on the HCMC – Trung Luong highway. Dinh Ngoc System ordered employees to falsify the financial ability profiles of two businesses in order to build trust and qualify for auction participation. The contract requires Cuu Long Corporation (under the Ministry of Transportation) to deliver the toll collection equipment to Yen Khanh Company. The company will inform the Cuu Long Corporation of the fee income, the upkeep status of the facilities and assets.
Despite knowing the regulations, the defendant Dinh Ngoc System instructed his subordinates to cut, hide income and appropriate the collection of fees by all means. Following the Dinh Ngoc System instructions, employees take advantage of the “manual” method of collection, not through the management software system. Yen Khanh Company does not include income from the above method in the income report. In order to cut more revenue on the management software, the defendants under the Dinh Ngoc system update and interfere with the toll collection software used by the toll booth. Objects set up and install software to copy and unroll a vehicle with a small ticket value for a car with a large ticket value from another lane to change the fare. After that, the defendants deleted all data from 10 data servers about the actual collection situation. According to the verification results, the amount excluded from the accounting system is more than 725 billion VND.
Accomplice of the defendant Dinh Ngoc System in the installation of computer software to conceal the violation reported in court
In the violation, the prosecution charged Dinh La Thang (former Minister of Transportation), Nguyen Hong Truong (former Vice Minister of Transportation), 5 accomplices (former leaders, state officials). “Violation of the rules on management and use of state property causes loss and waste.” Defendant Dinh Ngoc System (former Deputy Director General of Thai Son Corporation, Ministry of Defense) and 12 other defendants were indicted for “fraudulent appropriation of property”, “abuse of office and powers to cause influence of others to seek your own “.
[ad_2]
