[ad_1]
This court consists of 9 judges, of which 6 are appointed by the presidents of the Republican Party. In particular, three of these justices were appointed by Trump himself.
With the previous step, the Supreme Court denied the allegations of unfounded electoral fraud and demanded the deprivation of the right to vote of millions of voters.
This result paved the way for the Electoral College delegation to meet on December 14 to vote for Mr. Joe Biden as the winner in the last election.
Supporters of President Donald Trump protested before the Supreme Court in Washington on December 8. Photo: Reuters
The US Supreme Court measure on December 11 is seen as the final blow to hopes of nullifying the election results of Trump, who publicly supports the lawsuit. This leader has repeatedly boasted that once an electoral demand reaches the Supreme Court, he will win.
Messages posted on Trump’s Twitter account and other statements repeatedly undermined the judge’s neutrality and objectivity.
He hinted that the judges appointed by the Democratic president would rule against him and that the judges appointed by the Republican president would be on his side.
Hours before the court ruled, Trump continued to push when writing on Twitter calling for the Supreme Court to show “wisdom” and “courage.” After suffering the disappointing results, he criticized the court for “really disappointing people” …
This is not the first time the leader has complained to the Supreme Court.
Previously, his policies have repeatedly divided these judges when he has become the target of lawsuits, such as immigration bans affecting countries with a majority Muslim population, efforts to end the program for immigrants to the United States as a child without the adequate documentation.
Trump won his 2018 immigration ban lawsuit, but failed a second lawsuit.
The Trump administration often fares better in legal battles early in its term, according to CNN. However, over time, the Supreme Court was left unsatisfied when the Trump faction failed to abide by the rules of procedure.
Now, the Texas lawsuit is no different than a drop of water spilled into a glass. No Supreme Court judge has expressed an interest in accepting this case.
Judges may be dissatisfied with the hastily prepared content of the lawsuit, with many errors that weaken the argument, such as misspellings (misspellings of the Louisiana name) and false information about the state in which the petition is made. Representative Jeff Van Drew (State of South Carolina, instead of New Jersey) …
CNN said that through the move to dismiss the Texas lawsuit, the Supreme Court sent Trump a clear message: Stop.
[ad_2]
