[ad_1]
After a half-day closed-door trial, on December 11 at noon, the Hanoi People’s Court sentenced the former chairman of the Hanoi People’s Committee. Nguyen duc chung 5 years in prison for appropriating state secret documents. With this same crime, 3 accomplices include: Pham Quang Dung, a former policeman, sentenced to 4 years and 6 months in prison; Nguyen Hoang Trung, Mr. Chung’s driver, 24 months in prison and Nguyen Anh Ngoc, former deputy editor of the Editorial Secretariat – Member of the Secretariat Mr. Chung, 18 months in prison.
The defendants in the trial – Photo: VNA
This 12-12 morning, speaking to journalists, Judge Truong Viet Toan, who is presiding over the court session in this case, said that the case was moved from November 27 to the trial of only 13 days. Therefore, the evidence panel (panel) met day and night to read the file and decided to take the case to trial on December 11. “In this case, the defendant Nguyen Duc Chung, who is the head of the Hanoi government, knows the law very well. Therefore, the Panel had to study very carefully the documents and records related to the defendant Nguyen. Duc Chung. The short time should create a lot of pressure in the investigation of records “- Information from Mr. Toan.
Speaking of the sentence, Mr. Truong Viet Toan said that the Prosecution’s argument is not different from the court’s sentence towards Mr. Nguyen Duc Chung in particular, the defendants in the case in general. Therefore, the sentence between the proposal of the Prosecutor’s Office and the sentence of the court is relatively similar.
According to Toan, at the trial, the attitude and testimony of the accused Nguyen Duc Chung showed repentance and repentance. Furthermore, this defendant also apologized to the Party, the State and the people, admitting that his crime had greatly affected the prestige of the Party and the State.
“The defendant Nguyen Duc Chung is a well-informed person, who was once the head of the investigative agency, but due to his personal reasons, simply because he wants to know information about his acquaintances who led to the crime. Making judges like us feel very bad “- said Mr. Toan.
[ad_2]
