[ad_1]
When the head is exemplary
Many general comments say that anti-corruption work has changed over time due to the determination of the boss, sir?
We must affirm that our institutions are relatively good, the laws are always perfect and they go to the common standards of the world. Of course, there is a good institution, but just as important is a good implementation. Where the law is good, but the organization is not implementing it well, if not strictly, the law only stops on paper.
So the institution is good, but the most important thing is that the awareness and responsibility of the public service executor, especially the incumbent, must be further strengthened. The greater the responsibility of the leader, the more exemplary, the stricter the law and the more effective the fight against corruption. We have seen this very well. The Secretary General, the President of the State and the Head of the Central Steering Committee for the Fight against Corruption are very exemplary and fierce people in their work against corruption, which is why they have further strengthened the application of the law. Ultimately, anti-corruption work depends as much on the institution as on the organization and the forces of order.
How do you evaluate the model of the Central Steering Committee for the Fight against Corruption, formerly headed by the Prime Minister, but now by the Secretary General as Head of the Steering Committee? In your opinion, how effective is this change?
Previously, the Central Steering Committee on Anti-Corruption was a state agency headed by the Prime Minister. This committee is specified in the Anti-Corruption Law. Later, when the law is amended, we consider it necessary to further improve the position and independence of this agency, making this agency fully competent. He not only has authority in terms of the state, but also authority within the Party. Therefore, this Committee went from reporting directly to the Government to the Central Steering Committee of the Politburo, headed by the Secretary General. This ensures both authority and independence. And in fact it has been very actively promoted in the fight against corruption.
Many people believe and hope that, in the next term, the anti-corruption task will become stronger and stronger, but there are also concerns that it will loosen. And what do you think of this?
That depends on the political determination of the Party, the State and the chief. As the fight against corruption becomes stronger and stronger, more people and officials become more aware, seeing the strict punishment, of course, corruption will be reduced. Therefore, this concern is unfounded.
Nobody you can also check active
In addition to the results achieved, many comments also stated that the management of the responsibility of the boss when corruption occurs is not adequate.
The political and economic situation of the country and the world is always changing, that is why the law must change, complete, without gaps and take advantage of corruption. The law has always been mobilized and perfected to suit reality. What about the implementing organization? Although the law is relatively complete, but the sense of organization and execution of the head has fully met the practical needs? It’s a matter of keep trying.
Mr. Nguyen Manh Cuong
The Judicial Commission report still says so. Every year more cases of corruption are discovered because we do it better. Therefore, any locality that says “no corruption has been discovered” is unlikely to do well in anti-corruption work. At times, the work of detecting and fighting corruption is still seen as not going well. Because people still feel and evaluate corruption still exists. However, we did not discover any cases, so we must evaluate them as limitations, not as results, achievements.
Is this because the head of the agency, the unit is afraid of responsibility, so he covers up, hides and does not want to expose himself?
That is the insufficiency of the old law. Regarding the Anti-Corruption Law in 2018, we have corrected the course, the leader discovers the corruption and takes measures to prevent and minimize the damage of corrupt acts, then he will not be responsible.
As for preventive solutions, declaration of assets, do you feel when drafting the bill, there are many strong solutions, but then it fades sir?
One of the highlights of the new law is its property control institutions. The old legal institutions are transparent, while the new laws are institutions that control assets and income. Previously, many people had to testify, but only a few people made false statements.
In addition, we also have regulations on the control agency, verifying the assets, the income is widely dispersed, many tracks, not professionals, it depends on the boss, so it is not effective. So the basis for verifying assets and income is very narrow, for example, election, appointment of officials, or complaints and reports to perform verification. Or handling the dishonest statement is also very formal, many cases are not treated strictly.
Therefore, the revised law has exceeded this. First, the declared object is expanded but the declaration form is changed accordingly. When the initial statement includes all the issues, but then every year, we only focus on those who have positions and powers from the head of the department upwards. Therefore, the objects that directly control the annual asset disclosure are reduced, focusing on those that are most likely to be corrupt.
Along with that, the income asset control agency is also more focused, compact, more professional, and most importantly, ensures independence. They have more authority to control and verify assets and income. In particular, random control has been expanded, anyone can be randomly verified and verified, so it is imperative that everyone is honest in the statement. Then the next is the handling of infractions, if they are not truthful they will be withdrawn from the planning, not named …
Although we have not fully resolved the problem of handling the irregular increase in employee assets without a reasonable explanation of the source, we must confirm the institutions that control our assets and income. has made great progress. Just by being able to get it right, I think our asset and income control will be much better.
How do you feel when the public and individuals are concerned about the control of the assets of your relatives related to officials and officials?
This we must go step by step. Currently, people only raise the subject of the declaration of property with the officials, those who work for the state. As a public servant of the people and state officials, he must obey the declaration of assets and income. If non-cadres and civil servants are arrested again now, it will be very difficult, neither in the world nor in any other country.
However, we are also moving to control the legal income of people through the law of money laundering, payment via accounts. The law stipulates that transactions of a certain scale in the public sector must be paid through accounts, and then at a certain point society will multiply. This will prevent money laundering and corrupt practices.
Thank my Lord!
“When the fight against corruption becomes stronger and stronger, people and officials become more aware, seeing the strict punishment, of course, corruption will be reduced.”
Mr. Nguyen Manh Cuong
More than 6,000 delegates attended the anti-corruption conference
According to the Central Committee for Internal Affairs, this morning (December 12), the National Conference to review anti-corruption work in the period 2013-2020, held in Hanoi. The conference was held centrally in the Hall of the Ministry of Defense and broadcast online to 82 bridge points in the provinces and cities directly under the Central Government, military zones, military services, armies, corps, headquarters and equivalent in the Army.
The conference was chaired by the Secretary General, State President Nguyen Phu Trong, Head of the Central Steering Committee on Anti-Corruption. The conference was attended by members of the Politburo, members of the Secretariat, members of the Central Executive Committee and representatives of relevant ministries and agencies. The conference is held centrally and online. At the conference gathered in the Hall of the Ministry of Defense, there were around 670 delegates and almost 5,000 delegates who attended the conference online at 82 bridge points in the provinces and cities directly under the Central Government and in the Army.
Van kien
[ad_2]
