[ad_1]
HanoiThe Central Military Court considered on December 10 the appeal for non-custodial reform or suspended sentence of the former Deputy Minister of Defense, former Admiral Nguyen Van Hien.
Like Mr. Hien, Mr. Bui Nhu Them, former head of the Navy Economic Division, and Mr. Bui Van Nga, former director of Hai Thanh Island Tourism and Service One Member Limited Company, requested mitigation. fine or request a suspended sentence. However, two defendants, they and Russia, were absent from the appeals session for health reasons.
Defendant Pham Van Diet, former CEO of Duc Binh Group Joint Stock Company, appealed to reconsider the crime and alleviate the sentence and cancel the additional sentence.
Defendant Nguyen Van Hien at trial on the morning of December 10. Image: Xuan Hoa
Mr. Dinh Ngoc System (Ut “Tran”), former Deputy CEO of Thai Son Corporation and Tran Trong Tuan, former Deputy Director of Hai Thanh Island Tourist and Service One Member LLC, appealed injustice.
Mr. Doan Manh Thao, former head of the Navy Finance Division, appealed to consider some injustice and alleviate the penalty.
Of the eight people tried in the first instance, only Ms Vu Thi Hoan, former director of Yen Khanh Production and Trading Service Co., Ltd., did not appeal, accepted a 7-year prison sentence for Fraudulent appropriation of assets.
7 companies have appealed in the role of people with related rights and obligations: Yen Khanh – Hai Thanh Stock Company; Viet Tri Bridge BOT Stock Company; Thai Son Petroleum Joint Stock Company, Ministry of Planning and Investments; Commercial Joint Stock Bank for Investment and Development of Vietnam (BIDV); National Highway 20 BOT and BT Company Limited; Yen Khanh Group Joint Stock Company and Hai Thanh Island Tourist Service One Member LLC.
In presenting the reason for the appeal, Mr. Hien said that the trial court has not fully evaluated its context, cause, nature, degree and function in the case and has not fully considered the extenuating circumstances of the case. I.D.
He is the highest commander in the administration, but in terms of leadership, he simply “executes the resolution of the Standing Committee.” He suggested that the Panel consider it exhaustively because “the use of land for economic purposes is a sensitive and important issue”.
The former admiral said it was inappropriate to be accused of “failure to inspect, urge, not conduct partner capacity tests, fail to verify capital contribution, approve subordinate documents to enroll” is not appropriate. He simply admits that “it was not close enough, drastic enough.”
And Mr. System complained, alleging that defendants Diet and Hoan gave false statements and, at the same time, upheld all testimony at the trial session. Mr. System said they were just social friends, that there was no “boss and maid” relationship as Mr. Diet said earlier. The defendant also did not ask Ms. Hoan to be a director of the Yen Khanh Company.
In response, the defendant Hoan, also a niece, stated: “Mr. System said that is not true.” The defendant claimed to be the director, but all the jobs are operated by Mr.
The defendant Dinh Ngoc System at the trial on the morning of December 10. Image: Xuan Hoa
In the first instance session of May 21, the Navy Military Court sentenced Mr. Nguyen Van Hien to 4 years in prison for a crime Lack of responsibility has serious consequences.
Accused Dinh Ngoc System 20 years in prison for the crime Fraudulent appropriation of assets. Defendant Bui Nhu Them received 9 years in prison for the crime Violation of the regulations on land use planning. The remaining defendants were sentenced to between 4 and 15 years in prison.
The first instance verdict showed that, in early 2006, the Navy planned to put into economic practice more than 6,700 square meters of defense land on Ton Duc Thang Street, Ho Chi Minh City, ensuring compliance with regulations and legal benefits. Military service.
During the implementation process, defendants Them, Nga, and Thao proposed to the Standing Committee of the Naval Command Party Committee and directly implemented plans to convert the purpose of using the three mentioned land areas into economic lands. with territorial planning regulations. The three parcels were contributed with capital in contravention of the regulations, against the direction of the Minister of National Defense. In particular, land number 7-9 Ton Duc Thang, who was tricked by Mr. System and his accomplices, brought a bank mortgage so far, there are still more than 540 billion outstanding loans from VND.
Mr. Hien, then Commander of the Navy, was irresponsible in the management of land for defense, did not inspect the performance of the units involved, which led to the release of the certificate of right to use the land by the partner. mortgage, business conversion, assignment to a third party.
The actions of Mr. Hien and the defendants caused the Navy to lose the right to use three lands within 49 years, causing a loss to the State budget of 939 billion VND, the first instance verdict claimed.
Thanh van
