[ad_1]
Just because he was drowned out by the sound of sweet karaoke speakers, Quoc took his hand and stabbed him to death. – Photo: DANISH
On December 7, the High-Level People’s Court of Ho Chi Minh City rejected all appeals from both the accused and the victim, imposing the death penalty against Nguyen Anh Quoc (26 years old, resident of District 8, HCMC ) for murder. people.
According to the lower court ruling, at around 10:30 am on June 16, 2016, Quoc and some friends organized drinks and karaoke with sweet speakers on a vacant lot in Hung Long Commune, Binh Chanh District.
At 1:00 p.m. on the same day, Mr. Nguyen Van T. (who lives nearby) pulled his karaoke speaker out onto the empty lot on the street in front of where Quoc and his friends were drinking and playing neoclassical music.
After Mr. T. played the music for a while, the innkeeper asked Mr. T. to turn off the music and asked the Quoc group to sing it again.
Seeing Mr. T. walk towards the inn, Quoc chased and hit Mr. T. in the face, despite being discouraged by the people, Quoc continued to grab the scissors of a roadside fisherman and chase him until the inn. Mr. T. then came out and stabbed Mr. T. in the back.
Stabbed, Mr. T. ran towards the inn, but Quoc kept chasing him, stabbed T. in the head and left.
As a result, Mr. T. died on the way to the emergency. Quoc was arrested shortly after.
On June 15, 2020, the Ho Chi Minh City People’s Court sentenced Quoc to death for murder, and at the same time charged the accused with having to compensate VND 168 million to the victim’s family.
Subsequently, the defendant Quoc appealed for the reduction of the sentence. At the same time, Mr. T.’s father and mother also have an appeal requesting exemption from the death penalty for the person who caused the death of their son.
In appeals court, T.’s parents asked that the defendant live and rebuild his life because the defendant is too young and has 2 small children left.
However, the Panel said that the actions of the accused were thugs, committing crimes intentionally to the end, making it necessary to permanently exclude society. In addition, the first instance level has fully considered mitigating circumstances for the accused, so there is no basis to change the sentence.
