[ad_1]
Mr. Dang Cong Huan, Deputy Inspector General of the Government, chaired the dialogue with the participation of various ministries: Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment, Construction, Justice, Central Committee for Citizen Reception, National Voluntary Committee. festival; toward the Ho Chi Minh City People’s Committee, there was Vice President Vo Van Hoan and other city departments and agencies.
Defining 5-room boundaries in 3 districts
Immediately afterwards, the representative of the Government Inspectorate reported on the preliminary results of the inspection and review related to the complaints. First of all, with regard to the complaint about planning limits, households do not agree with the conclusion of the Government Inspector in the notice of conclusion of inspection No. 1483 dated 4 of 9 of 2018, whose content is not only 4.3 ha. located outside the planning limit, but people think that the 5 neighborhoods in 3 districts are outside the limit.
Security off-site dialogue |
In addition, compared with the regulations on the planning system of drawing symbols and construction drawings in the relevant period, the Government Inspection declares that the planning agencies do not sign or seal the drawings. The planning carried out before 7.7.2005 is in accordance with the regulations.
The Government Inspector analyzed the documents provided by the individuals.
Regarding the position of the boundary, the land of the homes reported, the representative of the Government Inspector said that on June 6, 1997, the Government issued Decree No. 03 on the establishment of districts 2, 7, 9, 12, Thu Duc and the city. establish new district wards. On March 18, 1997, the Ho Chi Minh City People’s Committee decided to establish District 2 with an area of 5,020 hectares with 86,027 inhabitants, including 11 districts, the boundaries of district 2 were identified on the district map and marked on the field.
In 1998, the Popular Committee of District 2 issued the decision to establish neighborhoods, residential groups, hamlets and popular groups, on that basis the location and boundaries of 5 neighborhoods belonging to the 3 districts that people complained about were determined.
Summary of conversation |
On the basis of household complaints, people provide some photocopied documents, including 2 documents related to planning of the new urban area of Thu Thiem, including Decision 255/1998 of the Ho Chi Minh City People’s Committee on the approval approve and adjust the areas not selling state-owned houses in the District 2 area and Decision 13585/1998 of the Chief Architect of Ho Chi Minh City on the 1/2000 planning of the new urban area of Thu Thiem have registered positions, limits, coordinates.
The test results show that Decision 255/1998 was issued after the Prime Minister approved the planning of the new urban area of Thu Thiem (1996). Comparing with the regulations in the relevant period, the Government Inspector said that the Ho Chi Minh City People’s Committee, which issued Decision No. 255/1998, did not update the planning, but still sold state-owned houses in urban planning . new Thu Thiem.
Furthermore, the area provided for in Decision 255/1998 is about 590 hectares, which is approximately 630 hectares smaller than the area provided for in Decision 367/1996. The Government Inspectorate said that the aforementioned actions of the Ho Chi Minh City People’s Committee are not in accordance with Decree 91, so they will propose to the Government to lead the HCMC People’s Committee to handle and rectify.
According to Decree 91, Decision 255/1998 of the People’s Committee of Ho Chi Minh City is not the basis for defining the limit of land acquisition planning and land allocation for the new urban area of Thu Thiem.
“The fact that people rely on the inadequate work of Ho Chi Minh City in regional planning does not sell state-owned houses in Decision 255/1998 to complain about the planning limit of the new urban area of Thu Thiem basis for consideration and settlement, ”said the representative of the Government Inspectorate.
The Government Inspectorate also said that Ho Chi Minh City Chief Architect’s Decision 13585/1998 on Detailed Planning 1/2000 Thu Thiem New Urban Area had errors in location and function compared to map and reality. practice. The aforementioned improper and irresponsible works were concluded in the Notice of the Government Inspector 1483/2018.
Finally, the representative of the Government Inspection concludes that there are sufficient bases to determine the location, the limit, the number of land that people complain about within the limit of the New Urban Zone of Thu Thiem. Therefore, people’s complaints have no basis to resolve.
>>> Thanh Nien continues to update
[ad_2]
