[ad_1]
Specifically, on the night of January 5, the Hoan Cau Times newspaper published: Foreign media causes trouble by promoting China’s Coast Guard Bill (translation: Foreign media caused trouble by inflating the Chinese customs bill ).
Risks for Vietnamese fishermen
Then the Hoan Cau Times published the above article to argue that China has the right to protect the waters under its sovereignty, other countries such as the United States or Japan also do the same, why China cannot. do (!?).
Protecting the sovereignty of a country is not bad, but the question is what is the maritime area under the legal sovereignty of China, what is the maritime area where the Chinese sea is legally applied?
Violence can occurChina’s new draft law on the country’s maritime forces could spark new tensions and possibly even violence. The bill outlines the new rules that apply to waters under Chinese jurisdiction, but long as behavior, Beijing avoids describing in detail which waters. In other words, from there, China’s “law enforcement ships” will be able to use weapons in any area, anytime it deems necessary, such as in the South China Sea or the East China Sea, and then justify yourself to validate the action. Mr. Greg Poling (Director of the AMTI Program – Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), USA) |
In fact, in the past, the Chinese customs scene has repeatedly engaged in illegal activities in the South China Sea. This is the maritime zone where the International Court of Arbitration took over the Chinese claim in 2016.
When the right to shoot is not “protected” but like this! So if the new bill goes into effect, the danger it poses is that the Chinese coast may use weapons to attack Vietnamese fishing boats that are legally fishing in waters under Vietnamese sovereignty in the East Sea. Therefore, the concern of experts and the international media is completely reasonable, not “exaggerated”, “causing trouble” as criticized by the Hoan Cau Times.
The risk of starting a conflict
Many international experts have expressed these concerns when responding to Thanh Nien. Similarly, yesterday, November 6, Thanh Nien responded, Dr. Satoru Nagao (Hudson Research Institute, USA) also said that the aforementioned bill presents many risks for other countries.
Defiant China built in Hoang SaPage BenarNews of November 6 reported that China has rebelled against many illegal construction in recent months in the Paracel Islands under the sovereignty of this country-occupied Vietnam. Satellite images showed many new construction, such as houses, power plants, and crops. On Duy Mong Island, a construction such as a helipad appeared, and construction sites on the ground near the pier were cleared. On Cay Island, satellite images showed that many works were beautified from April 21 to July 7 to support residency and cultivation. The greening of the land over a six-month period suggests that China may have blatantly brought in soil or used chemicals to gradually turn sand into soil. At Dune Tay, satellite images also show that China may have planted many trees instead of naturally grown trees. Khanh An |
“In the past, Beijing has steadily strengthened control over the waters it claims and, at the same time, has sent sea vessels to these waters. As Chinese coast guard ships become more present, countries in the region must also send the coast guard to respond. In such a context, the risk of collision is even higher. And if the previous bill goes into effect, the risk of a gun collision is even more likely, ”Mr. Nagao worried.
In addition, according to Mr. Nagao, the introduction of the draft reduces the “buffer zone” that are the civil order forces to avoid increasing tension. Beijing has consistently removed such “buffer zones”.
Therefore, he asked: “Why is Beijing introducing the previous bill? They are likely to want to increase tensions in regional seas. China is accelerating its military modernization and wants to show military dominance. To increase pressure on other countries, China is phasing out capital reserves to avoid the risk of conflict in disputed waters. “
[ad_2]
