[ad_1]
Former Vice Minister of Transport Nguyen Hong Truong – Photo: TUAN PHUNG
October 26, according to the source Online youth, The Supreme People’s Prosecutor’s Office indicted the case “violating accounting regulations, causing serious consequences; violating regulations on management and use of State assets, causing losses and waste” took place at Yen Khanh Group Joint Stock Company, Cuu Long Corporation and related units in the bidding and toll collection of the Ho Chi Minh City – Trung Luong highway.
The Prosecutor’s Office prosecutes the defendant Dinh La Thang, former Minister of Transport; Nguyen Hong Truong, former vice minister; Dinh Ngoc System, former chairman of the board of directors, former CEO of Thai Son Company and 17 other defendants.
Mr. Dinh La Thang ordered Ut’s “bald” company to purchase the rights to collect fees
In this case, Mr. Dinh La Thang was identified as a mastermind and leader.
According to the indictment, the HCM City – Trung Luong highway project was formed with the state budget, so the sale of the right to collect tolls is the sale of state property.
The Prime Minister assigns the Ministry of Transport the primary responsibility for formulating a plan to sell the toll collection rights and transfer the toll collection right to reimburse the state budget invested in the project.
However, when implementing the implementation, the defendant Dinh La Thang, then Minister of Transport, derived from his personal motive, through his previous acquaintance named Duong Tuan. Minh, the CEO of the Cuu Long Traffic Infrastructure Project Management and Investment Corporation and has “unusual” addresses.
Mr. Thang introduced and brought in the defendant Dinh Ngoc System to tackle the project, then facilitated the system company to win the auction for the right to collect tolls for the highways in Ho Chi Minh City – Trung Luong.
Dinh La Thang is determined to play a major role in the case – Photo: TT
According to the indictment, the defendant Dinh Ngoc System took advantage of the relationship to build a fraudulent file to participate in the auction for the right to collect fees. After winning the auction, this defendant continued to commit fraudulent acts aimed at seizing state property.
Mr. Thang has a clear understanding of the laws on state property management and the transfer of the right to collect fees, recognizing that this is a unique asset of particularly high value and should seek partners with financial capacity to optimize the sale of property rights. Toll.
He directed that Ut’s company was ‘bald’, which is an unprofitable company, without financial capacity to buy the right to charge fees.
In the implementation process, Mr. Thang knew that all the project implementation activities, the auction results were implemented in contravention of the law, so the defendant Dinh Ngoc System’s Yen Khanh company won the auction, appropriate for Mr. Thang’s Initial Introduction.
Furthermore, the prosecution blamed the defendant Dinh La Thang as responsible for all the violations by the Ministry of Transport officials in organizing the auction of the right to collect tolls on the Ho Chi Minh City Highway. Trung Luong for Ut’s “bald” company caused losses to the State of more than 725 billion.
Mr. Thang’s behavior constitutes the crime of “Violating regulations on the management and use of state property, causing waste loss.” Mr. Thang’s behavior created the conditions and the premise for Ut “bald” to take over the property, resulting in the loss of state property, for which he was responsible for the case.
Ut “bald” seized more than 725 billion
Former Vice Minister Nguyen Hong Truong knew that Ut “bald” had a relationship with Mr. Thang, stemming from the motivation of his superior relationships with his subordinates, so he had made mistakes in leading the winning unit. Pay money for 3 times in contravention of the law.
Mr. Truong is determined to have signed a decision approving the initial price of the auction, but without going through the pricing council or hiring a pricing organization.
Mr. Truong also signed a decision allowing the Sales Board to designate when only one person participated in the auction and bid at the asking price.
Defendant Dinh Ngoc System is found to have appropriated acts of more than 725 billion from the State – Photo: NAM TRAN
In particular, the defendant Truong also signed a document announcing that Yen Khanh Company and Ut Khanh An Company were “bald” eligible to participate in the auction, which in turn resulted in these companies being incompetent. keep participating in the auction and win the auction.
Mr. Truong’s actions violated many laws, causing damage to state property.
Defendant Dinh Ngoc System for the purpose of appropriating the right to collect fees, so from the beginning, there was a fraudulent trick, directing employees to falsify the loss to profit report and falsify the confirmation of the audit unit in the financial report. the year 2001 and 2002.
Since then, Ut’s company is “bald” eligible to participate in the auction even though his business has lost.
After winning the auction, due to lack of financial capacity to pay the contract, Ut ‘bald’ has extended the payment time to buy the fee.
In the fee collection process, the defendant Dinh Ngoc System continued to cheat, ordering the purchase and use of the Xuan Phi Company software to conceal the proceeds, and the report was not true.
Of these deceptive acts, the defendant Dinh Ngoc System with the help of his accomplices seized more than 725 billion from the State.
Who helped Ut “bald” to usurp more than 720 billion?
