[ad_1]
Ca Thi Ut (graduated from Hanoi University of Education but still has no job) ordered 150 wedding trays and escaped
“In my opinion, at present, the criminal law does not regulate the act of” bombardment “, that is, the order to use goods or services and then stop using them and not pay compensation, Refund to the recipient In fact, in the last Years, the “bombing” situation has happened quite a bit, but there is still no case to charge.
For most of the cases 150 tray covers In Dien Well, but did not take, although the damage to the restaurant owner is very great, the Penal Code has no corresponding offense to handle the object “bombing.” There are a number of crimes related to property infringement, but in this situation Ut did not take possession of the property, or the property was not damaged … so Ca Thi Ut could not be handled.
I think this is an unforeseen point of the legislators. Although the Penal Code “Accidentally Causing Serious Property Damage” stipulates that any person who inadvertently causes damage to someone else’s property worth VND 100 million or more will be subject to criminal penalties, But in the case of Dien Bien, Ca Thi Ut committed an act of intentionally causing damage to the property of the city restaurant and was saved from the crime.
Perhaps Ca Thi Ut will be criminally punished for another act, but for Ut “bombing” 150 slides, I still think that this object cannot be held criminally responsible. In this case, Ut will only be responsible for civil compensation for damages caused to the restaurant. “
(Lawyer GIANG HONG THANH, Giang Thanh Law Office, stated the above point Dan tri days 4-10)
[ad_2]
