[ad_1]
From June of last year until now, Thanh Hoa’s president coach (coach) has changed 5 times. Coaches Nguyen Duc Thang, Vu Quang Bao, Mai Xuan Hop, Fabio Lopez, and Nguyen Thanh Cong sat on this hot seat, respectively. But only a few months and then everyone has to “wrap the towel”. Is it because the head coach’s chair in Thanh is so “hot” that no one can sit for long? Or behind that is also due to other reasons, coming from the different way of making De’s choice?
|
Thanh Hoa Club uses 5 coaches in a year and the ‘victims’ of the De |
The root cause here is that these interventions are unreasonable and unprofessional.
For example, the election of De requires that coach Nguyen Thanh Cong from now on “when making a substitution decision in matches, there must be a consensus of the majority of BHL members (more than 50%)”. It is a very unreasonable request, because the substitution in each match is customizable, it is impossible to plan ahead, it is up to the coach to make a substitution decision from time to time. Again, it is necessary to wait for more than 50% of the coaching committee to agree to be replaced, sometimes the game turns in a different direction.
The sad end for coach Nguyen Thanh Cong |
Or like De’s choice to force the head coach to use 3 foreign soldiers and 1 naturalized player is also quite forced. If foreign soldiers and naturalized players are really good, of course the head coach will use them to strengthen the team, without the need to force. If you are poor, you have to leave it out, but why do you “force” the coach?
Any professional coach wants to have full professional decision-making power and not accept to work in such a forced way. That explains why, for the last 15 months, 5 coaches, from the young to the old, from the national coach to the foreign coach, no one can bear the strange road, unlike none of the Voters, and they all have to Towel wrapped.
Does Thanh Hoa’s club need to change not as much coach as it does, but rather the boss himself?
[ad_2]
