[ad_1]
On August 31, the police investigation agency of the Ministry of Public Security completed the conclusion of the investigation of the wrong case on the Ho Chi Minh City-Trung Luong highway.
The Ministry of Public Security sent the file and the conclusion of the investigation to the Supreme VKSND requesting the prosecution of 20 accused.
Consequently, the Ministry of Public Security proposed to prosecute the defendant Dinh La Thang (born in 1960, former Minister of Transport, currently handling the case in another case) for violating the regulations on the administration and use of state property. causing wasteful losses (under Clause 3, Article 219 of the Penal Code) with the main role of brain.
At the same time, it was proposed to prosecute the defendant Nguyen Hong Truong (born in 1957, former vice minister of GTBT and 5 accomplices for violating the regulations on the management and use of State property, causing losses and waste with the role of accomplice.
Mr. Dinh La Thang is the defendant in a trial. Photo: OLP
As for the case, it was proposed to prosecute the defendant Dinh Ngoc System (that is, “bald”) for defrauding assets with the role of intellectual author and taking advantage of powers to influence others. for profit. Twelve other co-conspirators were proposed to prosecute the fraud as suspects.
According to the conclusion of the investigation, Mr. Thang was the minister at the time, the head assigned to manage the property, including the right to collect the Ho Chi Minh City – Trung Luong highway charges. Mr. Thang signed a written proposal to continue looking for a partner to sell the rights to collect fees.
Dinh La Thang is well aware of the provisions of the law on the administration of state property and the transfer of the right to charge fees, and is well aware that this is a unique property with great special value. However, in February 2012, after being approved in writing by the Prime Minister on the policy of selling the right to collect tolls, Dinh La Thang telephoned Duong Tuan Minh to run Ut “bald” as a trading company. at a loss, they do not have the financial capacity to buy the right to charge fees.
In the process of organizing the auction, Mr. Thang signed a decision on the establishment of the auction council for the right to collect fees and the permanent team to assist Nguyen Hong Truong as chairman.
The entire construction and completion of the project and the results of the highway toll right auction, directly managed and directed by the Deputy Minister of the School, are reported to be related to Mr. Thang. Through these documents, Mr. Thang learned that all project development activities, the results of the auction of the right to charge fees were implemented in contravention of the law for the Yen Khanh company of Dinh Ngoc Hue to win. price, in line with your original presentation intentions.
At the same time, he also learned that the Yen Khanh Company lasted the payment of the winning money on time, violating the auction regulations, and the contract had to be terminated before the deadline and returned the right to collect the express fee to the government. However, when informed by Duong Tuan Minh, Mr. Thang not only ordered to terminate the contract before the deadline, but also asked Minh to let the company pay slowly.
Additionally, Mr. Thang also approved the proposal that this company be the investor to build two additional intersections on the Tan Tao – Cho Buffer route. And it is recommended that this company compensate the amount to be paid under the contract to purchase the fee collection contract, which leads the Yen Khanh company to remain unpaid in accordance with the profit regulations …
The crime of Mr. Dinh La Thang and the defendants in this case is found to have caused more than 725 billion VND in damages.
[ad_2]
