[ad_1]
Lawyer Tran Hong Phong provides information for the press – Photo: HOANG DIP
From the forensic examination record
Follow attorney Tran Hong Phong (legal support for the Ho Duy Hai family), When studying the autopsy log, the victim’s autopsy log, the description of the wounds on the victim’s body: “The neck has cuts, forming open cuts in the neck. Anterior (in cartilage) horizontal, open 5 cm wide, 9 cm long, deep to the cervical spine, left to right direction (An autopsy record of victim Nguyen Thi Anh Hong on January 14, 2008).
“The front area of the neck has a cut, forming a 5 cm open mouth, the edge is sharp, horizontal in the cartilage, 9 cm long, deep to the cervical spine, cut line pointing from left to right ” break most of the old organs “(Forensic Exam No. 21 / PY.08 for the corpse of Nguyen Thi Anh Hong on January 17, 2008).
For the victim of Nguyen Thi Thu Van, the cut was directed from right to left.
Lawyer Tran Hong Phong said that after studying the autopsy minutes, forensic examination records and other forensic scientific knowledge, it shows that if the author “comes face to face” with the victim to kill, the killer will be left-handed. If the perpetrator is right-handed, he must be behind the victim to commit murder.
To the testimony of Ho Duy Hai
Mr. Phong said testimony, field experiments, investigation findings, allegations, and two first-instance and appeal trials recorded that Ho Duy Hai committed a murder with a right-handed knife, face to face. face with victim Hong. Customs claimed that Hong fell to the ground and grabbed the victim’s hair with his left hand, his right hand holding a knife to cut his neck.
“This conflicts with the wound formation mechanism presented by the forensic examination, if the perpetrator is Hai, the conduct testimony is inconsistent with the actual image, if true, the left-handed player is not Ho Duy Hai because Hai He is right-handed. Whatever the reason, I think I need to re-investigate this case “- said Mr. Phong.
In addition to providing this information, the lawyer also said that with the same request, he continued to provide additional evidence related to Ho Duy Hai’s “alibi”.
“I affirm that the case still has many questions that have not been clarified, so it should be completely reviewed. With new evidence to discover and provide, I think Hai is a stranger” – he Feng share.
