Restoration investigating the case “Nhue” occupied the company of the person who reported the matter?



[ad_1]

After 1 business day, the Trial Court (HDXX) of the appeal trial of the criminal case against defendants Nguyen Van Lam and Pham Thi Quyet, accused of “abuse of confidence and appropriation of property”, arrived to the final conclusion. .

After the deliberation time, the High Court of the Judicial Council in Hanoi realized that the investigation and the gathering of evidence and the resolution of the case in the first instance were not sufficient, but the level of appeal could not complement it. First instance criminal trials must be canceled to re-investigate the case.

Restoration investigating the case

Appeal trial of a criminal case against defendants Nguyen Van Lam and Pham Thi Quyet on charges of “breach of trust and property grabbing”

Specifically, in the incident, Mr. Do Van Toi (65, residing in Group 13, Phuc Khanh Ward, Thai Binh City) accused Mr. and his wife, Ms. Quyet, of appropriating a loan from 900 million dong, the Council found it necessary to do so. Clearly contradictions in the payment statements of the two accused, where to pay, at what time, who was a witness, how to pay … At the same time, there must be a confrontation between the victim and the accused. Whether the problem is paid or not.

The Appeals Panel of the Court of Appeals also said that it was necessary to clarify whether Mr. and Mrs. Pan and Ms. Quyet had fled, because in the indictment of the Thai Binh Province People’s Committee, the conclusion of the investigation by Thai Binh Police Department and court ruling In the first instance, this is a sign of property seizure. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate Mr. and Mrs. Quyet and Mrs. Quyet why they fled, when they fled, where they went, what did they do? …

Restoration investigating the case

Therefore, the Panel decided to cancel the first instance verdict No. 25 of June 12, 2019, sending the file to the People’s Procuratorate of Thai Binh province for resolution in accordance with the law. The Panel also decided to temporarily ban the residence of the residence of Mr. Nguyen Van Lam and Ms. Pham Thi Quyet until the Thai Binh Province People’s Procuratorate again accepts the case.

Restoration investigating the case

Nguyễn Xuân Đường (also known as “Nhue”)

At the same time, the Panel recommended that the Investigative Police, Thai Binh Provincial Police, and Thai Binh Provincial People’s Procuratorate cancel the decision to prosecute Criminal Case No. 12, March 2018, from the Investigative Police Agency, Police in the Thai city of Binh; Prosecute the case, restore criminal investigations that occurred at Lam Quyet Company Limited (Vu Chinh Commune, Thai Binh City, Thai Binh Province).

Duc Van



[ad_2]