[ad_1]
Regarding Ho Duy Hai’s death sentence, National Assembly member Pham Van Hoa said: “With respect to human life, it is necessary to be objective, impartial, impartial and careful in judging and handling in accordance with regulations of the law “.
Do not be unlawful but do not fall into crime.
After 3 business days, on the afternoon of 8.5, the Council of Judges of the Supreme People’s Court announced the decision not to accept the appeal of the Chief of the Supreme People’s Procuratorate and to confirm the first instance criminal sentence, a criminal court of Appeals sentenced him to death by defendant Ho Duy Hai, accused of “murdering” and “stealing property”.
9.5, exchanging with the Labor reporter, the deputies of the National Assembly Pham Van Hoa, Deputy Head of the Dong Thap People’s Committee of Dong Thap province, member of the Legal Committee of the National Assembly, said that the death sentence of Ho Duy Hai was The case is very complicated.
First, the case involved 2 lives (2 employees of the Cau Voi Post Office, Long An). Secondly, there are doubts about the case of irregularities for criminals.
“With respect to human life, it is necessary to be impartial, impartial, impartial and careful when judging and managing according to the law. Not to cause irregularities, but to overlook criminals, “emphasized the Commissioner of the Legal Committee.
According to Mr. Hoa, in the face of doubts and complaints from the family of the death row inmate Ho Duy Hai, the protest of the Supreme People’s Procuratorate on the case, the Council of Judges of the Supreme People’s Court also hold a cassation review session to Evaluate and reconsider this case again to avoid cases of errors or inaccuracies.
At the same time, in the cassation session, the council of judges also asked related parties to clarify the problems that the Prosecutor’s Office protests, to clarify questions of doubt and different opinions to the public. make a fair, objective and legal decision. After reviewing and reviewing the case, the Supreme People’s Court Judges Council did not accept the appeal of the Director of the Supreme People’s Procuratorate and the death penalty for Ho Duy Hai.
Clear doubts
Speaking to reporters on this issue, Colonel Pham Truong Dan, a former deputy chief of police for Quang Nam Province, a member of the 13th National Assembly of Quang Nam Province, said that Ho Duy Hai’s death sentence had many respondents and many opinions, opinions differ from the term before to the present.
As a police officer, Dan said this was a serious case involving two lives. Therefore, the investigating agency with the responsibility not to ignore offenders must also be very considerate and cautious in the criminal case resolution process to uncover offenders. “It is very rare to have serious errors in serious cases” – said Mr. Dan.
According to Colonel Dan, the Supreme People’s Court needs to open a cassation review to review and re-evaluate the first instance sentences and the courts of appeal. At the same time, the cassation session is also to free psychology, clarify the doubts of public opinion related to this case.
“The evaluation, review of sentences, see the nature of the case, identify criminals in this review of cassation to avoid an unjust sentence but not commit crimes” – Colonel Pham Truong Dan said
At the cassation review of the death sentence in Ho Duy Hai on August 8, the chairman of the cassation review of the Supreme People’s Court Council of Judges voted on specific issues and 17/17 members agreed. rejected the Supreme People’s Procuratorate case against Ho Duy Hai’s death sentence.
Members of the Council of Judges said the first instance verdict and appeal sentenced to Ho Duy Hai was “correct person, correct sin, correct sentence”. Although the case has procedural errors as noted, those errors do not change the nature of the case.
[ad_2]
