“There is no basis to conclude that the gangster threatens to kill the entire family.”



[ad_1]

Lt. Col. Nguyen Ngoc Lan, Deputy Chief of Thach That Police District (Hanoi) just sent a text message. Intellectual people to provide information on the results of the verification and resolution of the case “the gangster threatens to kill the families of all people” in the Canh Nau commune, Thach That district.

Thach That District Police said Ms. Do Thi Bien reported Mr. Vu Van Tam (Town 11, Canh Nau Commune) and some gangster tattooed items to his family’s workshop in the Dong Vung area (Canh Nau Commune) cut down trees, used bulldozers and threatened to kill his entire family if they stopped him.

Ms. Do Thi Well in discussion with PV Dan Tri.

Upon verification, the Thach That District Police said that in 1999, the Thach That District People’s Committee, which included 9 parcels of land, awarded Ms. Do Thi Bien’s family with a certificate of rights to use of agricultural land (rice land). The land is over 323 m2 in the Dong Vung area.

In 2017, the Thach That District People’s Committee decided to reclaim the land in this area, including Ms. Bien’s family plot. However, Ms. Bien’s family does not receive compensation money, she is still suing and has not yet turned in the land.

According to the population expansion plan map in the Dong Vung area, Ms. Bien’s family parcel of land had previously been converted to parcels No. 162, 163 and a portion of parcels 88 and 161 Because Ms. Bien’s family has not yet turned in the land, she can assign land to households. In 2008, Ms. Bien’s family planted trees, gathered construction materials, built a cabin on a parcel of land, and the People’s Committee of the Canh Nau Commune requested a suspension.

Thach That District police reported that in 2017 Vu Van Tam (SN 1983, Hamlet 11, Canh Nau Commune) bought land to expand the population, but because the original owner of the farmland had not turned the site over to the People’s Committee from the Canh Nau Commune. Tam has not yet received the land.

Knowing that the previous No. 161 lot has not been assigned to anyone, Tam plans to build on this plot. After that, Tam hired people to throw sand on the parcel of land, leveled the ground, and was searched by Canh Nau commune police, requesting to stop all rapes.

On October 11, 2019, Tam and her son went to plot No. 161 using a hacksaw, cut a machete to cut 2 mangoes (6m tall), 1 acne tree (4.8m tall); all of these trees were due to Familia de Bien planted in 2009.

While Tam was chopping down trees, Ms. Bien’s children stopped and argued, but they did not quarrel or quarrel. During this time, two strange young men with tattoos on their arms on a motorcycle arrived on the scene, stopped, sat in the car for about 1 minute, and then left, without any abnormal action or behavior.

On October 13, 2019, Vu Van Tam continued to hire people to dump 2 sand cars onto the ground for leveling, and surrounded the No. 161 lot. According to Thach That District Police, during the implementation of Eight Throwing Sand, the Bien family continued to avoid but there were no fights.

On October 25, 2019, the Popular Committee of the Canh Nau Commune carried out a dismantling for violating the Vu Van Tam building order in this package.

“Based on the verification documents, it is determined that Ms. Bien Van Vu accuses the gang members of destroying trees, demolishing, threatening to kill people.” Ms. Bien’s family is unfounded, “said a text by Thach That District Police.

Therefore, the Thach That District Police Investigative Police Department decided not to prosecute the criminal case for “Destruction of Property” prescribed in Article 178 of the Penal Code; issue administrative sanction decisions for Vu Van Tam on acts of “Property Destruction”.

At the same time, there was a written request to the Canh Nau Commune People’s Committee to complete the file related to administrative violations in the field of land by Vu Van Tam to sanction administrative violations in accordance with the provisions of the law.

Headquarters of the Canh Nau Commune People’s Committee, Thach That District, Hanoi.

Please clarify the land issue for relaxing people

How Intellectual people Reflected, in a recent letter to the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment, Ms. Do Thi Bien continued to propose clarifying many issues, despite being directed and resolved by Permanent Deputy Prime Minister Truong Hoa Binh. clear but still “tone without choice”.

Ms. Bien said that in 3 times of granting land to relaxed people in 1989, 2003, 2006, her family was eligible and everyone submitted an application to the Canh Nau Commune People’s Committee to sell the family a piece of land, but it was not granted. determined

Meanwhile, the Canh Nau commune awarded many unskilled people, not the right subjects, even some people received twice.

In 2007, the Thach That District People’s Committee issued a decision to revoke the family from Ms. Bien’s parcel in the Dong Vung area to create land to relax homes and 1 parcel of land in the Dam area Xao to build land for artisanal villages, to rent with a total An area of ​​almost 660 m2.

Ms. Bien thought it was illegal for the Thach That People’s Committee to make the decision to recover two parcels of land from her family, not to inform her family …

In this matter, Permanent Deputy Prime Minister Truong Hoa Binh asked these agencies to coordinate to clarify that in the 3 times of land allocation to relax the population, is there a time when the family of Ms. Do Thi Bien is eligible under local regulations but not delivered? How many households and individuals have been on the population extension land allocation list submitted by the Canh Nau Commune People’s Committee and the Thach That District People’s Committee for approval but not actually received? Is it Do Thi Bien’s home in this category?

Does the Chairman of the Thach That District People’s Committee allocate 200 residential parcels without going through the auction of the right to use the land according to the law or not and causing a loss of the state budget?

The Kha



[ad_2]