[ad_1]
On April 26, 2020, in the state media, the full text of the article “Some issues that require special attention in preparing the staff of the 13th National Party Congress” of the Secretary General, President Nguyen Phu Trong, who also He is the Head of the Subcommittee on Personnel, he drew the attention of public opinion inside and outside the party.
Spratly has been red with fire since the summer of 1974
Chinese economic party and pliers for Vietnam
Vietnamese experts rejected Chinese arguments on Pham Van Dong’s note
One of the crucial and persistent points in the previous article is to emphasize that the work of party cadres is closely related to the regime. For the 13th National Congress, it was determined that the “fundamental” task of the “fundamental” was related to the survival of the Party, the destiny of the regime, the development and the strength of the country. “
‘Concerned’ for generations
Multigenerational communist leaders have always been concerned about this, especially before the 12th Congress. Former President Truong Tan Sang had a “feeling” in a recent article: “If the charts don’t work well, we topple.”
Under the leadership of the Communist Party of Vietnam, who is the head of macroeconomics, has overcome the “period of instability” and high growth in the four years of his mandate, the objectives of social development have also changed. positive turn At the same time, institutional reforms have been strengthened to strengthen party organization, centralize power, and fight corruption.
However, in the work of party personnel “the decline in ideology, morale and lifestyle of part of the leaders of party cadres remains an existential risk.
The article stated: ‘Since the beginning of the twelfth term until now, the Central Executive Committee, the Politburo, the Secretariat and the Central Inspection Committee have had to discipline almost 100 senior officials. under the direction of the Central; Some officials have been criminally handled. ”
A statutory power control regime should be established in place of party authorities, a form similar to ‘Force’ or ‘Imperial Domination’ in the feudal feudal regime.
One of the tasks of the human resources work of this period is ‘not to enter the 13th Central Committee’ of ‘unscathed’ rapists, ‘political opportunities’ in various forms of expression. , it’s very heavy’.
Because recently, on 03/20/2020, the Politburo “fired the former Secretary of the Ho Chi Minh City Party Committee for Le Thanh Hai for the period 2010-2015.” But this man on June 29, 2019, when he delivered a speech at a 50-year-old scientific conference on the Party Committee, authorities and people of Ho Chi Minh City who implemented the Will of President Ho Chi Minh, organized by the City Party Committee, Conference on Revolutionary Morals!
Is there any theoretical and practical basis to believe that the ‘elimination’ of ‘former comrades’, the selection and staffing by high concentration of power, can create a sustainable institution?
Is it in line with the rapidly changing reality in the world and in the country, when one of the causes of leadership ‘recession’ comes from the nature of the regime?
Learn from ‘instability’
To do the staff work well for the 13th Congress, Secretary-General Nguyen Phu Trong’s article emphasized the need to learn from institutional instability before and during the 12th National Congress.
Furthermore, he cited lessons from the early years of the October Revolution in Russia and the collapse of the former Soviet Union and the socialist regime in Eastern Europe, and suggested that one of the many reasons was incorrect choice and design. some leaders at the strategic level, especially at the highest level. ‘
This is a matter of debate depending on perspective, context, and historical period. The practical basis of this assumption is the “Reform and Openness” policy in China since the late 1970s and, similarly, the “Doi Moi” policy in Vietnam since 1986. The Communist Party has “self-regulated” to take advantage of the ‘greed’, which is the nature of capital, that is, of direct and indirect investments of the capitalist and emerging countries of East Asia, such as Japan and Korea. Kingdom for economic growth. The totalitarian regime of the Communist Party is accused of a bad situation of ‘human rights’ and ‘democracy’.
While many developed capitalist countries believe that economic growth will create improvements in democracy and human rights.
More than 30 years have passed since then, policy researchers and politicians have called this process of “transition” to the market, and now he wonders if there has been any change in the nature of the totalitarian regime. .
The notion that communist ideology promotes Vietnam and China to be more united than the ‘four’ good friendship ‘, the sixteen golden words’ together to build socialist regimes has been and is no longer relevant to reality and was
China, after a third of a century of rapid growth, has become the second largest economy in the world.
Based on national sovereignty, the “Chinese dream” is being accelerated by clear strategies, in which the expansion and violation of sovereignty in the South China Sea threaten the countries of Southeast Asia.
Vietnam has once benefited from the “experience of economic growth” thanks to its similar political regimes, and probably realized not, until it had to pay the public dearly for many outdated projects. technology, economic inefficiency and deep dependence on Chinese supply and markets.
Furthermore, Vietnam is the country most affected by China’s expansionary policies. The Chinese escape wave, which has a historical factor and a national psychology of the Vietnamese people, is growing due to the “militarization” and the “administration” of the Chinese government in the islands of the South China Sea under sovereignty. from vietnam
Everyone can promote deeper economic and political reforms.
World order and future direction
The fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 was a major event of the 20th century, followed by the collapse of the entire socialist system.
There are many ways to view and evaluate this event.
The period of “globalization” is considered to have started from there.
Professor Francis Fukuyama once declared ‘The End of History’, saying that, in Hegel’s way of thinking, democracy would be the ‘last’ in the history of the evolution of human civilization. In recent work, he is explaining his judgment about the “legitimacy” of states and regimes in a complex and turbulent world.
The “making the United States great again” policy by the 45th President of the United States, Donald Trump, points out that the “world order” is beginning to change dramatically.
Multilateral international relations are being reviewed and replaced by bilateral policies.
The COVID-19 pandemic, which started in Wuhan, China in late 2019, is in full swing, causing the world to experience the worst medical and economic crisis in centuries.
Many political and economic analysts around the world have “pessimistic” views that, after this pandemic, the world will not be able to return to the “old order”. An uncertain future lies ahead.
Secretary General and President Nguyen Phu Trong emphasized: “The 13th Party Congress is a very important political event … it will be a very important milestone and a significant future orientation” because it ties in relation to the national construction creed, the Strategy of Socioeconomic Development and the anniversaries of the main national holidays …
Institutional political reform should probably be implemented, in which changing the national and ethnic development strategy in the context described above will be a sustainable basis for the regime.
Only then will the importance of personnel to the entire political system be proportional to the treatment of the 13th Congress as a “historical milestone” that guides the future.
The document expresses the views of the author, former dean of the Department of Public Policy, Institute for Policy and Development, Ministry of Planning and Investment, Vietnam.