The Royals’ case for defense against Harry and Meghan’s claims



[ad_1]

The duchess also suggested that she had been forbidden from meeting her friends or speaking out against false stories in the tabloids.

But palace attendants insisted that they did their best to welcome Meghan, only to find that she “wanted to be the victim.”

“Everyone knew that the institution would be judged on its happiness,” a source told the Times. “The mistake they made was thinking that she wanted to be happy. I wanted to be rejected because I was obsessed with that narrative from day one. “

Another stated: “She wanted to be the victim because then she could convince Harry that it was an excruciating experience and that they had no choice but to move to America.”

Lawyers for the Duke and Duchess of Sussex have denied that this was the case.

During the interview, the Duchess claimed that the Palace press team had not defended the couple when “something is not true”, unlike the protection offered to the Duke and Duchess and Cambridge.

However, media insiders noted that in the months and years after their marriage, palace attendants had issued a series of denials on and off the registry in an attempt to defend their reputations. “They did their best to stop the stories which turned out to be completely accurate,” said a source.

Meghan also accused the Palace of organizing “Christmas parties” for journalists to try to get a better press.

But their claims were rejected by the Society of Publishers, which today said it was “not acceptable” for the couple to make such accusations without providing evidence.

The Duchess also claimed that she was unprepared for her role and that she “did not do any research” on the monarchy before marrying Prince Harry.

He added that he “did not fully understand what the job consisted of” and that he did not grow up “knowing much about the royal family.”

He claimed Sarah Ferguson had to teach him how to bow before meeting the queen, adding that “she had never looked up her husband online.”

However, in previous interviews, friends of the Duchess have revealed that she was fascinated by royalty in her youth.

Before the royal wedding in 2018, Ninaki Priddy, who was the Duchess’s maid of honor at her first wedding to Trevor Engelson, said her childhood friend “was always fascinated by the royal family. She wants to be Princess Diana 2.0 “.

“I had one of Princess Diana’s books [Diana: Her True Story] on his shelf, and even when he was with Trevor he told me that he wanted to go and stay in London for at least a month. I know you loved The Princess Diaries, movies about a commoner who becomes part of a royal family. She loved the idea. “

Archie denied the title

Meghan said she wanted Archie to be a prince so that he could have police protection, and expressed shock at the idea that the first colored member of the family did not have the same title as other grandchildren.

“In those months when she was pregnant, around the same time, we have in tandem the conversation of ‘You will not be given security, you will not be given a title’, and also concerns and conversations about how dark your skin might be when you are born. “, He said.

When asked by Mrs. Winfrey if she was saying that the royal family would have viewed it as “a problem” if Archie was “too dark,” the Duchess replied, “I couldn’t explain why, but that’s the assumption you’re making. , I think it feels pretty safe, which was really hard to understand, right? ‘

However, the actual rules suggest that Archie has not been singled out. Seventh in line Archie has no right to be a prince at this stage due to the rules established more than 100 years ago.



[ad_2]