[ad_1]
Rudy Giuliani’s reputation could take a further blow with the posting of very embarrassing images in Sacha Baron Cohen’s follow-up to Borat.
In the film, released on Friday, the former mayor of New York and current personal lawyer for Donald Trump is seen reaching into his pants and apparently touching his genitals while lying on a bed in the presence of the actor who plays the daughter of Borat, posing as a television journalist.
After a slavish interview for a fake conservative news show, the couple retreat at his suggestion for a drink to the bedroom of a hotel suite, which is equipped with hidden cameras.
After she takes the mic from him, Giuliani, 76, can be seen laying on the bed, fiddling with his unbuttoned shirt and reaching into his pants. They are then interrupted by Borat, who runs in and says, “He’s 15 years old. He’s too old for you.”
Giuliani’s representatives have not responded to requests for comment from The Guardian.
News of the incident first emerged on July 7, when Giuliani called New York police to report the intrusion of an unusually dressed man.
“This guy runs in, with a madman, what I would say is a pink transgender suit,” Giuliani told the New York Post. “It was a pink bikini, with lace, under a translucent mesh top, it looked absurd. He had a beard, bare legs, and was not what I would call an attractive distraction.
“This person comes in screaming and screaming, and I thought this must be a scam or a chase, so I reported it to the police. Then he got away, ”Giuliani said. The police discovered that no crime had been committed.
Giuliani continued: “Only later did I realize that it must have been Sacha Baron Cohen. I thought of all the people I had previously cheated on and I felt good about myself because he didn’t understand me. “
Viewers may be less convinced that Baron Cohen, reprising his role as bumbling reporter Borat Sagdiyev, and Maria Bakalova, who plays his daughter, Tutar, were unsuccessful.
In the film, the Kazakh government sends Borat back to the US to present a bribe to an ally of Donald Trump in order to ingratiate his country with the administration. After the monkey destined for the gift goes unwell, Borat’s supposedly underage offspring become the replacement gift.
Even before reaching into his pants, Giuliani did not appear to have performed particularly impressively during the match. Flattered and flirtatious, he drinks whiskey, coughs, fails to distance himself socially, and claims that Trump’s swift actions in the spring saved a million Americans from dying of Covid. He also agrees, in theory at least, to eat a bat with his interviewer.
Giuliani has become a key figure in the later stages of the US presidential election after obtaining a laptop hard drive that supposedly belonged to Hunter Biden and left at a repair shop in Delaware.
His efforts to unearth the political dirt on Trump’s rival in the White House mean the film’s mortifying images can be seen as an attempt to undermine Giuliani’s credibility. The film, released on Amazon Prime less than a fortnight before the election, ends with an instruction for viewers to vote.
Although unfortunate, the circumstances of the installation seem consensual, and Giuliani made believe he was being courted. Bakalova, 24, is highly plausible in the trap, despite having to pretend, for the benefit of viewers, to be a wild girl posing as a far-right journalist.
As with the first film, which made $ 262 million from its 2006 release and won a Golden Globe for Baron Cohen, the most troubling scenes are those that reveal deep-seated prejudices among the American people.
Baron Cohen’s barrage in real life against the platforms he believes allow anti-Semitism is reflected in the film, in which Borat discovers through Facebook that the Holocaust “was nothing more than a fairy tale.”
They correct it after a conversation with two old Jewish women, one of whom, Judith Dim Evans, died after filming, aged 88. Last week, her estate filed a lawsuit against the filmmakers, claiming she was “horrified and upset” by learning that “the film was actually a comedy meant to poke fun at the Holocaust and Jewish culture.”
However, Deadline suggests that the filmmakers assessed Dim Evans for the film’s true goals after his scenes were shot, and that there are footage of this. They are also said to be hoping their family will reconsider once they have seen the film, which ends with a dedication to Dim Evans and a link to a website created in his honor.
