[ad_1]
Parts of the press are using an investigation into Princess Diana’s Panorama interview in an effort to “drive a wedge” between her children, a source close to Prince Harry told Sky News.
They have also responded to claims that the Duke of Sussex is not protecting his mother’s legacy.
It follows an unexpected statement from Prince William earlier this week, tentatively welcoming the BBC’s decision to launch a independent investigation on how he secured the interview with his late mother in 1995.
Diana during her interview with Martin Bashir
The Duke of Cambridge said it was a “take a step in the right direction” and something that “should help establish the truth” about the “actions that led to the interview” and the decisions the BBC made at the time.
However, subsequent newspaper articles have questioned why Prince Harry did not issue a joint statement with his brother. It is understood that he has decided not to follow William by posting his own comments.
Some stories on Friday accused him of not supporting his brother and not protecting his mother’s legacy, suggestions that were described as horrifying and offensive.
Ever since the Duke and Duchess of Sussex decided to step away from royal duties and move to America, there has been a great deal of speculation about Harry and William’s relationship, and whether they have fallen out.
But a source close to him told Sky News: “Harry receives regular updates and is aware of everything that is happening.”
They added: “You don’t need a public statement to imagine how he feels in private. People know how much his mother means to him.”
“He has spoken boldly in the past about loss and grief and the immense impact it has had on him.
“Unfortunately, some people not only see this as a push for the truth, but they also try to use this as an opportunity to try to drive a wedge between the siblings.”
Prince Harry is said to receive regular updates on current events
In another development, Princess Diana’s brother, Earl Spencer, has criticized the mandate set for the investigation into how the BBC and interviewer Martin Bashir managed to interview his sister.
In a tweet, the earl said: “As I told the BBC tonight, I am not entirely satisfied with the parameters you set around your investigation into the Panorama interview with Diana 25 years ago. Lord Dyson must have the freedom to examine all aspects of this matter, from 1995 to today, as you see fit. “
In recent weeks, Earl Spencer has directed calls for new investigation into how the show’s creators used false documents to trick his sister into doing the interview, fearing they were being spied on and couldn’t trust those around them.
Earl Spencer has released documents that he claims were forged and used to encourage him, and his sister, to speak to Bashir.
He has described the corporation’s 1996 investigation into whether fake bank statements were used to help land the historic Panorama interview as a “cover up.”
The BBC recently said there was recovered a note written by Diana The confirmation of false bank statements did not influence your decision to participate.
[ad_2]
