Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab has refused to deny that ministers are considering introducing a higher level 4 of coronavirus restrictions, less than three weeks after the launch of the three-level lockdown model.
Officials are reportedly working on plans for an additional layer of measures that force nonessential restaurants and shops to close in the parts of England with the highest infection rates.
When asked if a new level 4 was being considered, Raab told BBC Radio 4’s Today show on Friday: “We are always ready for further action that we can take. But I think the most important thing about the additional measures is that we continue on the path we are following to attack the virus. “
Ministers are under increasing pressure to announce a nationwide circuit breaker, as hospital admissions in the hardest-hit parts of the country exceed the height of the first wave.
Raab, who is in fact Boris Johnson’s number two, insisted that the “overwhelming scientific advice” to the government was that local closures were “the right way to go.”
He said the government was “working hard to avoid” a second national blockade despite the fact that France, Germany and Wales announced similar measures across the country in recent days.
He told Sky News that the idea of ”a short, sharp circuit breaker is frankly something of a conundrum” and that those asking for one had not established the route out of a national intervention.
The government’s Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (Sage) warned five weeks ago that the government should urgently consider a two-week circuit breaker lockout across the country, similar to that in the spring while keeping most schools open. , but this was ignored at the time.
Raab said on BBC Radio 4’s Today show that “the overwhelming scientific advice for us is that specific actions are the right way to go if you take them and are committed to them.”
He added: “The arbitrariness of a general approach would be far worse than the effects of trying to be as specific as possible” and that a localized approach was “fair” and “fits the natural justice that we are focusing on in areas where the rebound is the biggest ”.