[ad_1]
Uncle Yusuf Aydemir, who was sentenced to two years without depriving the person of his liberty by force and fraud, was sentenced to an aggravated life sentence. Aydemir did not receive any reduction in his sentence. Furthermore, Yıldırım Artam, Ayşe Artam, Besim Dursun, Hatun Dursun, Mehmet Ali Aydemir and Musa Aydemir, who attended the hearing as defendants, were acquitted for lack of evidence.
DECISION MADE IN THE CASE OF MİNİK LEYLA
Uncle Yusuf Aydemir, who was arrested with aggravated life in prison three months after the verdict of little Leyla’s case, was released. In the request for the decision, “the decision to continue the detention of Yusuf Aydemir may make him irretrievable in the future, to be released considering that the detention is not a punishment but a measure, if he is not convicted or detained for another crime , you must write an order in the Main Office of the General Prosecutor’s Office of Ağrı, when the decision is finalized, send the file to the Court, submitting a petition to our Office within 7 days of notification of the decision in terms of the decision of rejection in subsection (I) and the release decision, or make a statement to the registry secretary so that it is recorded in the report, another Regional Court of Justice Criminal Chamber or of First Instance by sending a petition through of the Regional Court of Justice of Erzurum, 2nd Criminal Chamber of the Court to appeal to our Office, and be firm in terms of the decision of reinstatement in accordance with article 286/1 d the Code of Criminal Procedure. It was decided unanimously on 12/21/2020 ”.
“A NEW DECISION WILL BE MADE AFTER A BETTER EXAMINATION OF THE EVIDENCE”
In making a statement on the matter, Erdogan Tunç, the lawyer for Leyla’s mother and father, said: “The appellate court completely reversed and returned the verdict of 7 defendants in Leyla’s case. Since the court was decided with an incomplete examination and an incomplete investigation as justification, such a decision was made after it was better investigated that the court’s verdict would not be correct under these conditions, the evidence was better examined, and various procedures were not followed. . In the next process, the evidence to be examined will be re-examined and a decision will be made after the missing transactions are completed. “
