[ad_1]
University student in Muğla Pinar GultekinSuspects for Cemal’s murder Metin Avci The third hearing was held in the case in which he and his brother Mertcan Avcı were tried.
The defendants Cemal Metin Avcı and his brother Mertcan Avcı attended the hearing at the Muğla High Criminal Court III through the Audio and Video Information System of the prisons where they were detained. Gültekin’s relatives, the lawyer from the Ministry of Family, Labor and Social Services, representatives of the Muğla Bar Association, members of women’s rights associations and party lawyers attended. The request for a “refusal judge” was rejected by the Muğla First High Criminal Court.
WIFE SPOKE FOR THE FIRST TIME
Defendant Avcı’s wife, Eda Avcı, who was in the divorce stage and was heard as a witness at the hearing, said that she learned of the incident when the gendarmerie telephoned her father-in-law. After the event Monday Explaining that the lawyer went to the vineyard house after the lawyer told him that his wife had an affair with a girl, Avcı said that he noticed the very clean environment.
Eda Avcı said: “I realized there was a good cleaning in the vineyard house. The lawyer told me that my wife was having an affair with a girl, that the girl was missing and that they called her to testify. They did not speak about it. murder first. I found out later. We were constantly talking about whether she could have done such a thing. ” used expressions.
Eda Avcı, on the question of Rezan Epözdemir, the lawyer for the Gültekin family, “Why did you go to the vineyard house when you had not previously confessed to Cemal Metin Avcı’s crime?” I was there for 20 minutes. The photo of the girl was constantly being shared on social networks. I found out about their relationship, she was missing and I wonder if Cemal killed him. he answered.
Hunter, Epözdemir’s “Did you notice any abnormalities after the murder?” “He’s usually very calm, but he was even calmer and calmer. Did not eat. I asked him ‘There is nothing’. he said, but I realized something was up. “he replied.
FRIEND OF MERTCAN AVCI: HELPED HIM
Bensu Cantekin, girlfriend of one of the defendants, Mertcan Avcı, stated that Mertcan has been her boyfriend for five years, does not know much about the incident and does not see any anomaly in his actions. Cantekin, who argued that Mertcan did not have a close relationship with his brother, said: “He would just help him. He would bring drinks to the vineyard house from time to time. Mertcan recounted the incident himself, said his brother was taken away. He said that he was arrested for the disappearance of Pınar Gültekin. The broader content of the incident was later revealed by the press. “said.
The defendant Mertcan Avcı stated that two policemen arrived at the workplace on Monday morning and wanted to see the images from the security cameras. ‘What happened?’ By stating that his brother had been arrested for the disappearance of Pınar Gültekin, Avcı claimed that they learned about it for the first time.
“At that time, my psychology was very bad, they asked my father and me questions. They said that the last time he met with my brother about the disappearance of Pınar Gültekin. That’s when I found out.” Using the expression Avcı, the president of the court, “Why did he not say this in his previous statements?” on the question “I remember what I said.” Payment.
“WITNESS STATEMENT MESSAGES”
Rezan Epözdemir, the lawyer for the promised Gültekin family, claimed that the witness statements were memorized and fictitious. Stating that the murder was planned and committed in an organized manner, Epözdemir said: “Before the accused confesses to the murder, his wife, mother and father go to the scene of the murder. What was the motivation that led these people to the vineyard house? ” ? Actually, this is very clear. These people have vehicle registration records and cigarette butts near the crime scene. They went to the scene to destroy and hide the criminal evidence. ” found in the description.
Epözdemir also objected to the expert report sent to the court, arguing that the report was objective and far from scientific, not suitable for judgment, and stated that a new report should be prepared consisting of physical and chemical engineers.
Defending that they believe that Mertcan Avcı also participated in the murder, Epözdemir stated that there was a contradiction between the defendant’s statements and the statements of his girlfriend and that they would again file a complaint with the Attorney General based on the test result.
BROTHER RELEASED
The court board decided the continuation of the detention of the detained defendant Cemal Metin Avcı and the release of his brother Mertcan Avcı with the obligation to sign and the prohibition to go abroad.
