[ad_1]
THE CASE OF THE MURDERER
There were two sudden developments in the investigation initiated into the incident. The investigation carried out by the Muğla Prosecutor General’s Office against the murderer Cemal Metin Avcı and his brother Mert Avcı was completed. Aggravated life imprisonment was requested for the murderer Avcı for murder with monstrous sentiment. Sister Hunter was required to be punished for “hiding evidence”.
NO FAMILY AND PARTNER FOLLOW-UP
Another development is the following; After the murder, the Muğla Prosecutor General’s Office decided not to prosecute Cemal Metin Avcı, who allegedly helped Cemal Metin Avcı hide the body, about his mother Ayten Avcı, father Selim Avcı and his partners Şükrü Gökan Orhan, on charges of ‘destroy, conceal or change evidence of the crime.
INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE …
According to the decision, the suspects went to the vineyard house between July 16 and 20 at the time of the ‘deliberate homicide’ and subsequently concealed or destroyed the criminal evidence in order to prevent the truth from being revealed. that there was insufficient evidence to generate a public process against him. It was recorded.
OBJECTION TO THE DECISION OF THE PINAR FAMILY
Pınar Gültekin’s family lawyer, Dr. Rezan Epözdemir objected. The objection petition stated that the decision was unfair and illegal and should be repealed. In the petition, in which it was pointed out that Cemal Metin Avcı committing this murder only went against the usual flow of life, logic and physics tables, it was stated that it was not legal and practically possible to put the Pinar of 1, 83 tall only in the barrel in the fetal position.
New to the murder of Pınar Gültekin! About the mother and father who allegedly aided in the murder …
“NO COINCIDENCE”
The petition pointed to the MOBESE records of the vehicles belonging to the family and the couple who went to the vineyard house the night of the incident and said: “Whatever the wisdom, when jointly evaluated in the direction of the plateau or house of the vineyard, which is the place where the murder was committed, it is clear that this is not a coincidence. “
In the last part of the petition, “Suspects Ayten Avcı, Selim Avcı and Şükrü Gökan Orhan, and Eda Avcı, who was not even interviewed as a suspect and for whom no further prosecution was conducted, is sufficient to generate public prosecution for the crime of destruction, concealment and modification of evidence It is evident that there are doubts and there has been an obligation to appeal the decision for these reasons.
[ad_2]
