[ad_1]
GOOD Party Chairman Meral Akşener was the guest of Turkish Pulse’s Haberturk private TV shows.
Speaking about the position of the member of the Constitutional Court (AYM) Engin Yıldırım in ‘Lights are on’, Akşener said: ‘Did you feel the implication of a coup? to the question, “Well, I don’t know. However, if this friend had paid $ 1 million on that tweet he was posting at the time, he would not have helped the AK Party. It was a tweet that would set the conscience in motion ”.
“THAT TWEET REQUESTED AN DISCUSSION IN A DIFFERENT WAY”
Akşener spoke as follows:
* I would like to express that it does not seem correct to me that bureaucrats, especially judges and prosecutors, oppose politicians on social media, including all members of the Constitutional Court.
* Because then I maintain that you have a legal situation, you left with the man you went to, he would be in a state of subsidies, which seems very harmful to me.
* There was a debate on the Constitutional Court. This concerned friend evolved elsewhere with the ‘light’ tweet. While it was cut in a different way in another debate, the noble and the number Bahceli started the discussion of the number that seems to me very significant in terms of Turkey, I cannot find the correct one.
* Turkey has long been destroying institutions, the dignity of the place is managed from one angle of view. I don’t find this right.
“MUST ANSWER”
To the question “If a member of the Constitutional Court, Engin Yıldırım, resigns or initiates a disciplinary investigation”, Akşener gave the following response:
* I think I should quit. My personal opinion. At a time when arrows were fired at the Constitutional Court out of nowhere …
* The bar associations came to the fore, the bar associations separated. Now a debate has started on the Constitutional Court. I do not think it is correct to act in a way that justifies that discussion.
* On the other hand, among the members of the Constitutional Court today, one person is previously, the rest are all the people named and appointed during this ruling.
“THIS PHILOSOPHY OF AYM CANNOT CHANGE”
Akşener continued as follows:
* You may not like the decisions made by AYM. But it definitely applies the AYM decisions. It is such a mess that we are going through a legal and judicial crisis, although Enis Berberoğlu discusses it in private.
* The Constitutional Court is the highest court to protect your rights individually, if we are all wounded against power. This cannot happen when you try to change your philosophy.
* We also know that in the past, the Constitutional Court was with the guardians. But over time, each party learned a lesson and reached a certain point. We see the institutions collapse one by one with the Party Presidency.
* I believe that every step to take is not correct except to correct those institutions, if they are lacking, arbitrate in a legal sense, gain independence. This attribute of AYM that protects us all must be maintained.
“BERBEROĞLU SHOULD RETURN TO THE ASSEMBLY, ABES FROM SPY ACTION”
“Should Berberoğlu go back to parliament?” Responding to the question, Akşener said: “Of course I should go back. This is my opinion ”and used the following expressions:
* Enis Berberoğlu is someone I know as a human. Your espionage trial is absurd.
* In the name of objectivity and democracy, I know what your wife has assumed with Mr. Erdogan as a journalist in his most difficult moment.
* They are people of espionage, not of blows. I don’t understand what was asked of Enis Berberoğlu. I think the subject of this place is not Enis Berberoğlu.
It may interest you
It may interest you
[ad_2]
