[ad_1]
In literature he is known as “spin doctor”; It can be translated as “master of tevil”. Difficult work is transferred to them; They are asked to change the subject and ease the blow to the party.
Said to represent the conservative idealists of the GOOD Party Yavuz For Ağıralioğlu I think “master of tevil” a more suitable language occurs. After all, he was not tired until he proved that his party was not in league with the HDP. In the last program he attended, he said that Demirtaş should be released according to the ECHR decision. But in saying this “Turkish bedroom, Turkish state, Turkish people “ the main idea is adorned with expressions like don’t smile too much: “Demirtaş is free being released “. However, it is not a problem; again, you criticize the AK Party with the mantra of “megri, megri” on the solution process and clean the page.
In the current situation, apart from the AK Party-MHP alliance, no one in Parliament has opposed the release of Demirtaş. Sırrı Süreyya Önder from HDP had the following to say: “Tool of us sender, who will we work with here, what Wondering our thoughts on how to do it The IYI Party cannot give us coordinates. “
Or what HDP’s Fatma Kurtalan said: “IYI Party, I’m telling you. HDP and people who have dedicated themselves to the PKK The vote. HDP in their seats You sit down with your vows. What will you say to this now?“
They say what is necessary ..
***
BRUSSELS DEPUTY IN THE COURT OF TBMM
CHP Istanbul MP Turan Aydoğan asked AK Party MPs “Who are you?”Implementation of the Demirtaş judgment of the ECHR look what is happening to you You will starve. European council no reward for contradicting Do you believe? ” he threatened. It is written as a CHP MP, pronounced as a Brussels MP. This job has no party! It is the duty of every worthy person to fight against this mentality that sees Europe as a master and a slave.
***
IT IS NOT THE FIRST DECISION OF THE ECHR
The final decision is not Demirtaş’s first decision of the ECHR. They also decided to release Demirtaş in November 2018. The final decision, on the other hand, is not about a verdict, but about a case whose internal legal stage is not over yet. Therefore, it is completely political.
Further, Terrorist organization ETA linked Unanimous in the decision to close Batasuna The reasons of the ECHR that gave its approval of lawyers do not condemn terrorism it even had to be. Demirtas in Turkey “our leader” to PKK leader Öcalan. He says; Öcalan also founded HDP He says.
While the evidence is so clear, the fact that Brussels has not made a decision against the HDP cannot be explained by law. We will fight the PKK or we will obey the ECHR. There is no middle way.
[ad_2]
