[ad_1]
The detained defendant Emre Çiçek was connected to the hearing at the 8th Bakırköy Higher Criminal Court through the Audio and Video Information System (SEGBİS). The party’s lawyers, including the lawyer from the Ministry of Family and Social Policies Büşra Öztürk and the defender of the AHBAP platform Betül Öztulum, were present at the hearing.
The head of the court said that the hoarseness caused by the damage to the vocal cords caused by the incision in the area of the victim’s neck, in the report of the Department of Forensic Medicine of the University of Istanbul, caused constant difficulties in the speech of the victim.
DISCLAIMER ANNOUNCED
The details of the horror were explained in the prosecutor’s opinion on the merits. It was reported that the defendant Emre Cicek took Rabia Kaçmaz to a fisherman in Florya by renting a car on February 6, 2019, after he said he wanted to leave it.
After the fisherman, the defendant Çiçek, who is said to have brought Kaçmaz to the textile workshop where he worked, said that the defendant tried to cover Rabia Kaçmaz’s eyes with black tape saying “I told you I had a surprise for you”, but the young man did not allow it. According to the ruling, in which it is stated that the defendant Emre Çiçek began to pull in Rabia Kaçmaz, who was heading towards the door, Çiçek dropped Kaçmaz to the ground, restricted his freedom with plastic handcuffs, tied his feet and knees and dragged the rear of the workshop to the rear of the workshop.
class = “cf”>
“YOU WILL NOT LEAVE HERE”
It was said in the opinion that the defendant kicked Kaçmaz and told him: “I brought you here to punish you, you will not be able to leave here. I will destroy you here”, and then Rabia Kaçmaz left her to speak with her mother on the phone.
After the phone call, it was said that the defendant came to Kaçmaz and injured him in the kidney with a knife and sexually abused him. It was noted that the defendant became angry after Rabia Kaçmaz’s opposition to the sexual abuse and it was emphasized that Çiçek attempted to strangle Kaçmaz with a pillow. They then told Dana that Çiçek turned off the lights, covered Kaçmaz, and left.
class = “cf”>
After some time, the defendant Emre Çiçek returned to the workshop with the other defendant Yunus Kıldır, kicked Kaçmaz in the head and said, “Haven’t you died yet?”, And the defendant Yunus Kıldır told Çiçek: “Keep me out of this. Don’t worry. He was said to have tried to turn his back and walk away, saying” I’m not saying anything “and Çiçek came out with the other defendant, saying” Wait a minute. “
Checked if he lived or not
Approximately 3 minutes later, the two defendants returned and put Kaçmaz in the sack with his head bowed, and the defendants were said to put the young woman in the trunk of the rented vehicle. It was reported that the accused Emre Çiçek threw the complainant out of the trunk next to the Avcılar Firuzköy lake, threw the complainant to the ground, stepped on the young woman to check if she was alive and then ran over her in a vehicle.
Found tied with tied pig
In the report, in which it was stated that the defendant Emre Çiçek called his father and explained the situation, it was observed that Çiçek turned himself in to the law enforcement officers and that the law enforcement officers who came to the scene found Kaçmaz tied up with a pig tie and half naked. It was also noted that Rabia Kaçmaz was hospitalized and remained in intensive care for a long time.
In the report prepared by the Observation Department of the Institute of Legal Medicine, it was also emphasized that it was determined that criminal responsibility for the crimes against the accused Emre Çiçek was full.
class = “cf”>
PENALTY OF UP TO 53 YEARS PENALTY REQUESTED
In the interview, the defendant, Emre Çiçek, was asked to be sentenced to prison terms of 19 to 53 years in total for the crimes of “deliberately attempting to kill with monstrous feelings or tormenting”, “depriving a person of his liberty with more than one person “and” sexual assault. ” The other defendant, Yunus Kıldır, was asked to be sentenced to between 4 and 14 years in prison for “deprivation of liberty with more than one person”.
DETENTION CONTINUES
In announcing its provisional decision, the court board decided to continue with the arrest of the accused. The delegation adjourned the hearing, giving the parties time to prepare their statements on the opinion.
