[ad_1]
Sevinç Çelik (32) was operated on his nose on May 2, 2014 in a private hospital. Çelik, who was discharged one day after the 2-hour operation, experienced severe pain and a high fever. Çelik’s pain gradually increased. Çelik, who went to the hospital for a check-up a week after the operation, was removed. Although Çelik made his complaints to the surgeon who performed the surgery, he allegedly received a response from the doctor: “They’re normal, you’re so sweet.” Returning home, Çelik’s situation worsened. Her brother N. Çelik said of her sister’s situation in court: “As time passed, the fever, pain, nausea and vomiting increased. You didn’t even have to go to the bathroom; We were dragging it, ”he said. Çelik was taken to the emergency room at the state hospital on May 19.
EITHER LIFE OR LEGS
Seeing that Çelik’s condition was bad, the doctors said that after the surgery, the germs mixed with his blood and spread throughout his body. Çelik’s feet developed bruises when he was taken to the intensive care unit. Doctors told his family: “The patient’s condition is critical. We have to cut off your legs. Either his life or his feet, ”he asked for the family’s consent. The family gave their consent if they were desperate. On June 9, Çelik had two legs amputated below the knee. Çelik, who underwent rhinoplasty, was released from the hospital a month later and lost both legs.
1 MILLION INDEMNITY
class = “cf”>
Alleging that the hospital where the cosmetic surgery was performed gave ‘faulty service’, Çelik filed a lawsuit with a claim for 300 thousand TL of material and 700 thousand TL of moral compensation. In his petition, attorney Cesim Parlak stated that the surgeon who performed the surgery acted against a duty of care. In defenses made on behalf of the hospital, it was noted that the hospital did not have a fault related to the amputation of Çelik’s legs. In the petitions, it is alleged that Çelik was poisoned by the chicken food he ate two weeks after the surgery, which is why the infection occurred.
2 of his legs were cut off
Istanbul Anatolia 3rd Consumer Court had an expert report prepared at the request of the plaintiff. Five reports, including those prepared by the Institute of Forensic Medicine, were included in the file. In reports, it was noted that no connection could be made between plastic surgery and the cutting of Çelik’s legs. Çelik’s lawyers stated that the reports prepared were incomplete and that a detailed report should be prepared. The court requested a new report at the 16th hearing held on December 10. The court decided to take a report from the Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine to reveal whether the hospital had a fault in the cutting of Çelik’s legs. The next hearing on the file, in which 6 judges have changed in the last 6 years, will be held at the end of next April.
