[ad_1]
The singer Halil Sezai Paracıkoğlu, who was arrested for mistreating his neighbor in Tuzla, was sentenced to 1 year, 11 months and 17 days in prison for “simple gunshot wound”, “insult”, “damage to property “and” violation of home immunity. “
According to the AA report, the detained defendant Halil Sezai Paracıkoğlu was connected to the hearing at the 12th Anatolian Criminal Court of First Instance through the Audio and Video Information System (SEGBİS). The complainant Hüseyin Meriç and the parties’ lawyers were also present at the hearing.
At the hearing, the defendant, whose identity was identified, Paracıkoğlu said that he was a university graduate and that his monthly income was between 10 and 20 thousand lire.
Stating that he did not accept the accusations made in his defense, Paracıkoğlu said: “First of all, I am very sorry that such an incident occurred. It is really sad for me to do something like this as an artist. There is a disagreement between us and the complainant that goes back on the day of the incident. We wanted to shoot in the garden, which is the common garden of Murat Aytaç Ağırlar, who uses it as an office with his wife, however, these shots could not be made due to the intervention of the complainant, he said.
Explaining that they were unable to shoot due to the loud voices of the complainant while shooting, the defendant Paracıkoğlu continued as follows:
“He prevented us from shooting by broadcasting loudly through the large speakers he used, sometimes hearing things in Arabic that we don’t understand. At the same time, he was making a strong call to prayer. I wanted to find a break by talking to him a few times. . I tried to talk to him between 5 and 6 times. But they all came out negatively. He didn’t allow us to speak. He yelled and insulted and threatened. When we realized that we couldn’t shoot here, we decided to change the filming location. “
Paracıkoğlu said: “On the day of the incident, I wanted to speak to the complainant one last time and resolve the issues. To do this, I bought flowers with very good intentions and went to the complainant’s residence. When I went to the residence, the complainant insulted me. He cursed me and slapped me. There was an argument between us. I didn’t take the piece of wood to hit myself and I didn’t hit him. I didn’t threaten him in any way. It’s true that I insulted him. I’m sorry about what happened. “
“I PASSED THROUGH THE FLOWERS TO SMOOTH THE ENVIRONMENT”
Defendant Paracıkoğlu asked why he went to buy flowers on the day of the incident: “I wanted to buy a gift. I wanted to soften the atmosphere. I wanted to create some positivity. Hüseyin Meriç is a difficult person to talk to, I went with flowers to soften the atmosphere and relax. I wanted to make a sweetie and give a gift … “he said.
Paracıkoğlu, who was asked why he took the piece of wood in his hand, said: “It was purely for humor. It meant accepting the flower without making wood.” used the expression.
Defendant Paracıkoğlu said: “On the day of the incident, I did not intend to break the mosquito net. I tripped over the mosquito net and damaged it due to the effect of alcohol. I also did not intend to enter the house. I do not remember exactly that moment. We also recovered the damage caused by the mosquito net. We accept the reasons for the arrest. First, I request my release and acquittal. ” said.
Defendant Paracıkoğlu’s lawyer, Ahmet Gürel, argued that his client had committed this action under unjust provocation and said: “If the piece of wood allegedly used in the incident was used, the injury would not have occurred as reflected in the report. forensic. This piece of wood weighs approximately 2.5 kilograms. If it had existed, it would have been a serious ecchymosis. However, there is not even an ecchymosis in the incident. The only evidence here is the statement of the complainant. Let me be acquitted of my customer spoke.
THE CLIENT REQUESTS TO PUNISH THE DEFENDANT PARACIKOĞLU
Plaintiff Hüseyin Meriç, stating that his complaint was still continuing, said: “On the day of the incident, I was leaving the front door of my residence open because my son was coming to see me in the morning. Only the mosquito net was closed. I heard a noise, I thought it was my son. He opened the mosquito net and entered the house, as soon as he entered he hit me in the face with wood.
Meanwhile, he threatened me. I took the wood from his hand and ran off. Here he came and grabbed me by the neck. He continued to insult and threaten. When I had the opportunity, I went out of the garden to the street. I was worried that no one was there and that he might kill me. The defendant continued his actions here as well. It is not true that I insulted him and slapped him. I didn’t do anything when he came in. He attacked me directly with wood. I complain about him. I demand that he be punished. “
Counsel for the complainant Meriç demanded that the file be referred to the higher criminal court for “deliberate attempted murder”.
Defendant Halil Sezai Paracıkoğlu, whose last words were uttered, said: “It is true that I committed the act of deliberate wounding. But I did not do it with a weapon. I only used my hands and feet. I regret the incident. I demand that my acquittal be decided. “. He spoke in the form.
HALİL SEZAİ EVACUATED
In announcing its verdict on the case, the court sentenced the defendant Paracıkoğlu to 10 months in prison for having committed the crime of “simple injury” using wood considered as a weapon.
The court sentenced defendant Paracıkoğlu to 4 months and 25 days in prison for “insults”, 6 months and 20 days for “violating housing immunity” and 2 months and 20 days for “damaging property”, and defendant Halil Sezai Paracıkoğlu was sentenced to 1 year 11. He decided to be sentenced to 17 months in prison.
By stating that the defendant Halil Sezai Paracıkoğlu would not commit a crime again, the court stated that there was no positive opinion in the court and that there was a prior conviction for “willful damage” in the criminal record, for which the court ruled that there is no place for postponement of the announcement of the verdict on the sentences imposed on Paracıkoğlu and a postponement decision.
The court ruled that the words spoken by the defendant Paracıkoğlu while continuing the act of deliberate wounding did not constitute a crime of “threat”, but that there was no place for a trial for this crime.
The court also ordered the release of the defendant Halil Sezai Paracıkoğlu.
