[ad_1]
While the detained defendant Abdullah Uçmak was attending the hearing at the 3rd Superior Criminal Court in Istanbul, Ersin Altun, who was arrested for another crime, was connected to the Audio and Video Information System (SEGBİS) from his prison.
Lawyers for Buket Çakıcı, who was İbrahim Tatlıses’ assistant at the time, and his driver Hakan Çalışkan and the accused lawyers were also present at the hearing.
At the hearing, the prosecutor said that he reiterated his opinion on the merits he presented between sessions. In the interview, it was pointed out that the defendant Emin Birdal had committed the crime of supplying the organization with weapons by taking the explosives sent by the defendant Abdulvahip İş for use in sensational actions by the person named “Rojglav”, a member of the terrorist organization armed, and hand them over to Nihat Şimşek.
In the ruling, the defendant Emin Birdal, whose inclusion in the hierarchical structure of the armed terrorist organization could not be determined, was asked for a sentence of between 15 and 22.5 years in prison for “supplying weapons in order to use them in activities of an organization “.
class = “cf”>
According to the opinion of the defendants Abdullah Uçmak, Ersin Altun and Yunus Ayık, who would have carried out an exploration of the place before the action, according to the characteristics of the weapon used in the crime, the place and time of the crime, the number of cartridges obtained from the crime scene and the scope of the entire file, İbrahim Tatlıses was said to be awaiting the end of the television show.
With Tatlıses exiting the building, it was observed that Ersin Altun, one of the defendants instigated by the defendant Abdullah Uçmak, took action with the vehicle used by the other defendant Yunus Ayık and approached the vehicle, including its driver Hakan Çalışkan and the Tatlıses’ assistant, Buket Çakıcı. .
According to the view that the defendant Ersin Altun shot with a Kalashnikov pistol, with the rear seats where İbrahim Tatlıses was expected to sit and in the direction of the right front seat, the life of Buket Çakıcı in the rear seat of the vehicle was stated that he was injured in a way that could be dangerous and cannot be eliminated with simple medical intervention.
APPLICATION FOR 40 YEARS FOR 3 OF THE DEFENDANT
class = “cf”>
In the ruling, Abdullah Uçmak was asked to be sentenced to a prison term of 26 to 40 years for the crime of “intentional murder” against Hakan Çalışkan and Buket Çakıcı, and the defendants Ersin Altun and Yunus Ayık for “deliberate assassination attempt”. .
The defendant Abdullah Uçmak, who was asked if he would say after the opinion, said that none of the petitions he wrote in court that he was tried was taken into consideration, and said that he went to the hearing to make a defense due to the accusations against Buket Çakıcı.
Uçmak claimed that the Fetullahist Terrorist Organization did everything possible to humiliate him and that he is currently on trial for shooting a woman, saying: “He is the singer who knows best that I will never shoot a woman or a child. Even defend myself from shooting. against a woman is humiliating for me. I have repeatedly said that I have nothing to do with this incident. Our request for a new trial is not accepted because we do not have a politician behind us, because we do not have strong lawyers, because we do not have money “. used expressions.
“WHY IS THE FETUS DECISION ON MY BACK?”
The defendant Uçmak said that a process was initiated against the prosecutor, the president of the court and the members of the court for affiliation to FETO, saying: “They constantly made me throw me out of the room, they did not speak. I have been sleeping for 10 years, I don’t know why what I went to bed “. said.
Claiming that the court and the media are in favor of Tatlıses, Uçmak said: “We have always said so, but they wrote everything against us. I don’t deserve it. Why is the FETÖ decision on my back?” I speak.
class = “cf”>
Noting that he was hostile to İbrahim Tatlıses in the late 1990s and early 2000s, Uçmak said that when he saw Tatlıses’ relatives in his environment, he left that environment so they would not be afraid of hostility between them. Flying, “God exists, I am very happy they shot him (İbrahim Tatlıses)”. used the expression.
Plaintiffs Çalışkan and Çakıcı’s lawyer, Ahmet Küçük, stated that the defendant’s defense was gossip and said they agreed with the opinion and wanted all defendants to be punished.
The hearing was postponed so that the other accused attorneys prepared their defense on the merits.
CASE BACKGROUND
After İbrahim Tatlıses participated in the filming of the program “İbo Show” on March 14, 2011, when he was leaving Nurol Plaza in Maslak, Istanbul with his assistant Buket Çakıcı, he was attacked by five people and seriously injured by firearms. long-barreled on the right side of the head. Tatlıses’ assistant Çakıcı was also injured in the attack, and his driver Hakan Çalışkan survived the incident unharmed.
The 17th High Criminal Court in Istanbul, which dealt with the Tatlıses assault case, sentenced 12 defendants, including Abdullah Uçmak, to prison terms of between 3 and 36 years.
Following the appeal of the decision, the Criminal Chamber of the Court of Appeals examined the defendant Abdullah Uçmak, “establishing and directing an armed organization to commit a crime”, “deliberately attempting to kill qualified” against the artist İbrahim Tatlıses, “qualified threat to the victim Ahmet Taşçı “approved the prison sentences imposed for” violating the Firearms Law No. 6136 “.
The department interrupted the prison sentences handed down for the actions against defendants Abdullah Uçmak, Ersin Altun, Yunus Ayık and Emin Birdal against Tatlıses’ assistant Buket Çakıcı and his driver Hakan Çalışkan.
THIS VIDEO MAY BE INTERESTED IN
