[ad_1]
The controversy between the Minister of the Interior, Süleyman Soylu, and the president of the AYM, Zühtü Arslan, is increasing. Claiming that Zühtü Arslan was the president of the Police Academy for a period on the live broadcast that he was invited, Minister Soylu said: “I expelled 41 percent of the deputy commissioners received by the president of the Constitutional Court of FETÖ” .
Minister Soylu, in his statement after the Constitutional Court canceled the provision of “no demonstrations and marches on interurban roads”, pointed to AYM president Zühtü Arslan, saying: “You approved the abolition of the right to walk freely. on the main streets. You don’t need police protection. “Go work with your bike, let’s see.” Zühtü Arslan, on the other hand, responded to Soylu’s words: “AYM decisions are not sacred texts, they can be criticized. To criticize any text, you must first read and understand it. “
SENDING LIVE FETUS
Interior Minister Süleyman Soylu, who was invited to the “Gündem Özel” program broadcast by TGRT News, responded to the words of Zühtü Arslan, president of the Constitutional Court. Soylu said: “I understand very well what I have read. I don’t need to be a teacher for this. This is a statement from the terrorist organization PKK. He says, ‘The state is the murderer. Those you describe as martyrs are also the murderers of the been there. AYM gives this to Tayyip Erdogan and those who insult the state. It also gives the decision of freedom of thought. “
“I EXPORTED 41 PERCENT OF ASSISTANT COMMISSIONERS”
Stating that the President of the Constitutional Court Zühtü Arslan was serving as President of the Police Academy, Minister Soylu said: “I expelled from the FETÖ 41 percent of the deputy commissioners received by the President of the Constitutional Court. Therefore, you need to be careful when recruiting people for the state. I’m not saying they bought them on purpose. ” He said.
THE PRESIDENT OF AYM SAID ‘READ FIRST’
In his speech, President Arslan had also implicitly responded to Interior Minister Soylu’s criticism of the decisions of the Constitutional Court. Aslan said: “Criticism of court decisions is also within the scope of freedom of expression. Judicial decisions, especially decisions of the Constitutional Court, are not deeds. It can be criticized, it must also be criticized. “The judicial institution whose decisions are criticized will benefit the most from this.” Noting that it is necessary to read and understand any text to be able to criticize it, Arslan said: “We see in some critiques of decisions that our decisions are criticized before being read, sometimes they are not understood enough … The effectiveness and usefulness of the Criticism for those criticized depends largely on the style used. Many times, how you say “how” gets in the way of “what” you say. Undoubtedly, the style or style of expression is also guaranteed by freedom of expression. Of course, everyone is free to choose the style they want. However, it is clear that expressions that focus on decision-makers rather than judicial decision and go beyond criticism will not benefit, because they will keep criticism out of the way. “
